Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275783›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2022

Optimal Choice of Adjuvant Treatment for Renal Cell Carcinoma Following Nephrectomy.

Achille Bottiglieri, Pierangela Sepe, Marco Stellato, Chiara Pircher, Giuseppe Fotia, Alberto Giovanni Leone, Valentina Guadalupi, Melanie Claps, Patrizia Giannatempo, Elena Verzoni and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Achille BottiglieriMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4345-3355
Pierangela SepeMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Marco StellatoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Chiara PircherMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe FotiaMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Alberto Giovanni LeoneMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Valentina GuadalupiMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Melanie ClapsMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia GiannatempoMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Elena VerzoniMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9756-6112
Giuseppe ProcopioMedical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the fourteenth most common cancer worldwide. In about 55% of cases, it is diagnosed at a localised and/or locally advanced stage and therefore amenable to a curative approach. Although nephrectomy still represents the cornerstone of non-metastatic RCC (nmRCC) treatment, a relapse is observed in about 25-30% of patients undergoing curative surgery. Prognosis is drastically influenced by lymph nodal involvement. After the first disappointing results with a cytokine-based strategy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were tested as adjuvant agents. Despite their efficacy in the metastatic setting, results in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) are not unequivocal and the overall survival (OS) benefit has not been demonstrated. Moreover, their toxicity profile induced a remarkable percentage of patients to discontinue the treatment. On the contrary, the KEYNOTE-564 trial showed the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab compared with placebo in terms of DFS with promising results in term of OS. Patients included were at intermediate or high risk of relapse, or patients with no evidence of disease after metastasectomy (M1 NED). The updated analysis presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genito-Urinary (ASCO GU) 2022 confirmed the benefit of pembrolizumab versus placebo over time, although OS data are still immature. A longer follow-up and the several ongoing trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) will provide further data about adjuvant immuno-oncology (IO). Furthermore, the patients' selection based on clinical or biological features will be crucial in order to identify who benefits most from treatments.

Indexed as

clear cellimmunotherapypembrolizumabpost-operativeRCCTKIs

Identifiers

PMID36275783
PMCPMC9584769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.