Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275556›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Plant growth-promoting microorganisms as biocontrol agents of plant diseases: Mechanisms, challenges and future perspectives.

Mohamed T El-Saadony, Ahmed M Saad, Soliman M Soliman, Heba M Salem, Alshaymaa I Ahmed, Mohsin Mahmood, Amira M El-Tahan, Alia A M Ebrahim, Taia A Abd El-Mageed, Shaimaa H Negm and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed
58.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 311 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial Genetic Resource Conservation Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Advances in the Control of Plant Fungal Pathogens.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  15. Selection of aMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  16. Global perspective on the genetic architecture of susceptibility to spot form net blotch in barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  17. Potential ofBiology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Mohamed T El-SaadonyDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmed M SaadDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Soliman M SolimanDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Heba M SalemDepartment of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Alshaymaa I AhmedDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Mohsin MahmoodKey Laboratory of Agro-Forestry Environmental Processes and Ecological Regulation of Hainan Province, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Amira M El-TahanPlant Production Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, The City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Alexandria, Egypt.
Alia A M EbrahimJiangsu Key Laboratory for Microbes and Genomics, School, of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
Taia A Abd El-MageedDepartment of Soils and Water, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Shaimaa H NegmDepartment of Home Economic, Specific Education Faculty, Port Said University, Port Said, Egypt.
Samy SelimDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad O BabalghithMedical Genetics Department, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed S ElrysSoil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Khaled A El-TarabilyDepartment of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Synan F AbuQamarDepartment of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Zagazig University · EGCairo University · EGUnited Arab Emirates University · AEAl Jouf University · SABeni-Suef University · EGCity of Scientific Research and Technological Applications · EGFayoum University · EGHainan University · CNNanjing Normal University · CNPort Said University · EGUmm al-Qura University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases and pests are risk factors that threaten global food security. Excessive chemical pesticide applications are commonly used to reduce the effects of plant diseases caused by bacterial and fungal pathogens. A major concern, as we strive toward more sustainable agriculture, is to increase crop yields for the increasing population. Microbial biological control agents (MBCAs) have proved their efficacy to be a green strategy to manage plant diseases, stimulate plant growth and performance, and increase yield. Besides their role in growth enhancement, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria/fungi (PGPR/PGPF) could suppress plant diseases by producing inhibitory chemicals and inducing immune responses in plants against phytopathogens. As biofertilizers and biopesticides, PGPR and PGPF are considered as feasible, attractive economic approach for sustainable agriculture; thus, resulting in a "win-win" situation. Several PGPR and PGPF strains have been identified as effective BCAs under environmentally controlled conditions. In general, any MBCA must overcome certain challenges before it can be registered or widely utilized to control diseases/pests. Successful MBCAs offer a practical solution to improve greenhouse crop performance with reduced fertilizer inputs and chemical pesticide applications. This current review aims to fill the gap in the current knowledge of plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPM), provide attention about the scientific basis for policy development, and recommend further research related to the applications of PGPM used for commercial purposes.

Indexed as

biofertiIizersbiopestcidecrop yielddisease suppressionpathogen suppressionplant growth-promoting rhizhobacteria

Identifiers

PMID36275556
PMCPMC9583655
OpenAlexW4303184554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.