Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275539›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Xylem anatomy and hydraulic traits in

Enrico Battiston, Sara Falsini, Alessio Giovannelli, Silvia Schiff, Corrado Tani, Roberta Panaiia, Alessio Papini, Stefano Di Marco, Laura Mugnai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrico BattistonSezione Patologia Vegetale ed Entomologia, Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Sara FalsiniLaboratorio di Biomorfologie, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Alessio GiovannelliIstituto di Ricerca Sugli Ecosistemi Terrestri, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy.
Silvia SchiffLaboratorio di Biomorfologie, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Corrado TaniLaboratorio di Biomorfologie, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Roberta PanaiiaLaboratorio di Biomorfologie, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Alessio PapiniLaboratorio di Biomorfologie, Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Stefano Di MarcoIstituto per la Bioeconomia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bologna, Italy.
Laura MugnaiSezione Patologia Vegetale ed Entomologia, Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITResearch Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapevine grafting is an essential practice in viticulture and over the years, various bench grafting techniques have been developed to mechanize the nursery process and to increase the yield in number of viable cuttings. Bench grafting is a fundamental nursery practice that can potentially affect the quality of propagation material also in young decline associated to grapevine trunk diseases and has been recently reported to influence leaf symptoms development associated with diseases of Esca complex. The study aimed to investigate how three bench grafting methods [i.e., (i) Omega graft as mechanical technique, (ii) Whip and Tongue graft as manual technique and (iii) Full Cleft graft as semi-mechanical technique] can influence these phenomena. Specifically, the different methods were compared for their effect on the anatomical development of the grafting point and the functionality of the xylem, also considering two factors: the grapevine cultivar (Cabernet Sauvignon, Glera and Teroldego) and the scion/rootstock diameter (thin and large). Observations by light microscopy on the anatomical evolution and measurements on the xylem morphology and hydraulic traits were correlated with the grafting methods and the investigated varieties. The anatomical observations revealed that the mechanical (Omega) and semi-mechanical (Full Cleft) grafting methods have a faster callusing response while the manual technique (Whip and Tongue) has a slower but greater vascularization of the differentiated callus. Significant differences between cultivars and/or grafting types were also detected in necrotic area on the grafted tissues. Statistical analysis of the grapevine vessels suggested differences in xylem parameters between cultivars, while grafting type had no significant effects. On the other hand, the grafting type significantly affected the intrinsic growth rate. The study confirms the potential incidence of lesions and dysfunctionalities correlated with the grafting method applied, which can potentially induce grafted vine declines in vineyards due to the necrotic area detected on the grafted tissues.

Indexed as

graftinggrapevine nurserypropagation materialwood diseaseswounds

Identifiers

PMID36275539
PMCPMC9581319
OpenAlexW4301586433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.