Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275520›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Multi-environment genomic prediction for soluble solids content in peach (

Craig M Hardner, Mulusew Fikere, Ksenija Gasic, Cassia da Silva Linge, Margaret Worthington, David Byrne, Zena Rawandoozi, Cameron Peace

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig M HardnerQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mulusew FikereQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ksenija GasicDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Cassia da Silva LingeDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States.
Margaret WorthingtonFaculty Horticulture, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, United States.
David ByrneCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Zena RawandooziCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Cameron PeaceDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Clemson University · USTexas A&M University · USAgriculture and Food · AUUniversity of Arkansas System · USUniversity of Queensland · AUWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype-by-environment interaction (G × E) is a common phenomenon influencing genetic improvement in plants, and a good understanding of this phenomenon is important for breeding and cultivar deployment strategies. However, there is little information on G × E in horticultural tree crops, mostly due to evaluation costs, leading to a focus on the development and deployment of locally adapted germplasm. Using sweetness (measured as soluble solids content, SSC) in peach/nectarine assessed at four trials from three US peach-breeding programs as a case study, we evaluated the hypotheses that (i) complex data from multiple breeding programs can be connected using GBLUP models to improve the knowledge of G × E for breeding and deployment and (ii) accounting for a known large-effect quantitative trait locus (QTL) improves the prediction accuracy. Following a structured strategy using univariate and multivariate models containing additive and dominance genomic effects on SSC, a model that included a previously detected QTL and background genomic effects was a significantly better fit than a genome-wide model with completely anonymous markers. Estimates of an individual's narrow-sense and broad-sense heritability for SSC were high (0.57-0.73 and 0.66-0.80, respectively), with 19-32% of total genomic variance explained by the QTL. Genome-wide dominance effects and QTL effects were stable across environments. Significant G × E was detected for background genome effects, mostly due to the low correlation of these effects across seasons within a particular trial. The expected prediction accuracy, estimated from the linear model, was higher than the realised prediction accuracy estimated by cross-validation, suggesting that these two parameters measure different qualities of the prediction models. While prediction accuracy was improved in some cases by combining data across trials, particularly when phenotypic data for untested individuals were available from other trials, this improvement was not consistent. This study confirms that complex data can be combined into a single analysis using GBLUP methods to improve understanding of G × E and also incorporate known QTL effects. In addition, the study generated baseline information to account for population structure in genomic prediction models in horticultural crop improvement.

Indexed as

factor-analyticG × Eglobal genomic predictionmixed modelsmultivariateparsimony

Identifiers

PMID36275520
PMCPMC9583944
OpenAlexW4302307181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.