ArticleAJOG global reports2022
Laparoscopic pectopexy for patients with intraabdominal adhesions, lumbar spinal procedures, and other contraindications to sacrocolpopexy: a case series.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-year outcomes of an innovative laparoscopic pectopexy procedure using inverted T-mesh for treatment of advanced uterine and anterior vaginal prolapse.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Scoping Review.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A Novel Technique to Manage Pelvic Organ Prolapse; An Original Study in Asian Women in Rural Area.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Pectopexy vs sacrocolpopexy: an analysis of 50 cases in a North American hospital.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic pectopexy is an alternative to sacrocolpopexy utilizing fixation points in the anterior pelvis for vaginal vault suspension; it was originally developed for an obese population. This is a retrospective case series of 7 women who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy at one academic Institution between October 2019 and December 2020. The patients had preoperative vaginal vault prolapse (pelvic organ prolapse quantification system [POP-Q], stage 2 and 3). Pectopexy was performed because of relative contraindications to sacrocolpopexy, including use of antiplatelet therapy, extensive adhesions, and chronic back pain with lumbo-spinal fusion. No intraoperative complications were documented in this cohort. Average blood loss was 32.9 mL. All the patients were discharged home within 24 hours. One patient experienced urinary retention that required release of the retropubic midurethral sling placed at the time of pectopexy. The most recent follow-up examination occurred at an average of 127 days after the procedure. All 7 patients had a resolution of their prolapse (POP-Q ≤1). This case series highlights the application of pectopexy for patients with extensive adhesions, use of antiplatelet therapy and lumbar or sacral spinal surgical history. The complication rates and operative results are comparable with sacrocolpopexy at intermediate-term follow-up in this small case series, indicating that pectopexy may be a promising alternative for patients with relative contraindications to sacrocolpopexy. This is the first report of the application of the technique in North America.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.