ArticleJournal of computational physics2022
A cell-resolved, Lagrangian solver for modeling red blood cell dynamics in macroscale flows.
Article in Journal of computational physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bridging the scales for deformable red blood cells simulation: from resolved immersed boundary to unresolved CFD-DEM.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2026Article
- Multi-scale simulation of red blood cell trauma in large-scale high-shear flows after Norwood operation.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Investigating the effect of turbulence on hemolysis through cell-resolved fluid-structure interaction simulations of individual red blood cells.Physical review fluids · 2024Article
- A homogenized two-phase computational framework for meso- and macroscale blood flow simulations.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2024Article
- Review on Blood Flow Dynamics in Lab-on-a-Chip Systems: An Engineering Perspective.Chem & bio engineering · 2024Review
- Analysis of the Suitability of an Effective Viscosity to Represent Interactions Between Red Blood Cells in Shear Flow.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
When red blood cells (RBCs) experience non-physiologically high stresses, e.g., in medical devices, they can rupture in a process called hemolysis. Directly simulating this process is computationally unaffordable given that the length scales of a medical device are several orders of magnitude larger than that of a RBC. To overcome this separation of scales, the present work introduces an affordable computational framework that accurately resolves the stress and deformation of a RBC in a spatially and temporally varying macroscale flow field such as those found in a typical medical device. The underlying idea of the present framework is to treat RBCs as one-way coupled tracers in the macroscale flow by capturing the effect of the flow on their dynamics but neglecting their effect on the flow at the macroscale. As a result, the RBC dynamics are simulated after those of the flow in a postprocessing step by receiving the fluid velocity gradient tensor measured along the RBC trajectory as the input. To resolve the fluid velocity in the immediate vicinity of the RBC as well as the motion of the membrane, we employ the boundary integral method coupled to a structural solver. The governing equations are discretized in space using spherical harmonics, yielding spectral integration accuracy. The predictions produced by this formulation are in good agreement with those obtained from simulations of spherical capsules in shear flows and optical tweezers experiments. The accuracy of the present method is evaluated using unbounded shear flow as a benchmark. Its computational cost grows proportional to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.