Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275071›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Development and validation of a sepsis diagnostic scoring model for neonates with suspected sepsis.

Rozeta Sokou, Georgios Ioakeimidis, Daniele Piovani, Stavroula Parastatidou, Aikaterini Konstantinidi, Andreas G Tsantes, Maria Lampridou, Dimitra Houhoula, Nicoletta Iacovidou, Styliani Kokoris and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neonatal Sepsis: A Comprehensive Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rozeta SokouNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Agios Panteleimon" General Hospital of Nikea, Piraeus, Greece.
Georgios IoakeimidisNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Agios Panteleimon" General Hospital of Nikea, Piraeus, Greece.
Daniele PiovaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Stavroula ParastatidouNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Agios Panteleimon" General Hospital of Nikea, Piraeus, Greece.
Aikaterini KonstantinidiNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Agios Panteleimon" General Hospital of Nikea, Piraeus, Greece.
Andreas G TsantesLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Maria LampridouNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, "Agios Panteleimon" General Hospital of Nikea, Piraeus, Greece.
Dimitra HouhoulaLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Nicoletta IacovidouNeonatal Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Aretaieio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Styliani KokorisLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Aristeidis G VaiopoulosLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Argyri GialerakiLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Petros KopteridesIntensive Care Unit, Excela Health Westmoreland Hospital, Greensburg, PA, United States.
Stefanos BonovasDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Argirios E TsantesLaboratory of Haematology and Blood Bank Unit, "Attiko" Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic model for sepsis among neonates evaluated for suspected sepsis, by incorporating thromboelastometry parameters, maternal/neonatal risk factors, clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory results. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 291 neonates with presumed sepsis, hospitalized in a NICU, from 07/2014 to 07/2021. Laboratory tests were obtained on disease onset and prior to initiating antibiotic therapy. Τhromboelastometry extrinsically activated (EXTEM) assay was performed simultaneously and Tοllner and nSOFA scores were calculated. Sepsis diagnosis was the outcome variable. A 10-fold cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logit regression procedure was applied to derive the final multivariable score. Clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis. Results: Gestational age, CRP, considerable skin discoloration, liver enlargement, neutrophil left shift, and EXTEM A10, were identified as the strongest predictors and included in the Neonatal Sepsis Diagnostic (NeoSeD) model. NeoSeD score demonstrated excellent discrimination capacity for sepsis and septic shock with an AUC: 0.918 (95% CI, 0.884-0.952) and 0.974 (95% CI, 0.958-0.989) respectively, which was significantly higher compared to Töllner and nSOFA scores. Conclusions: The NeoSeD score is simple, accurate, practical, and may contribute to a timely diagnosis of sepsis in neonates with suspected sepsis. External validation in multinational cohorts is necessary before clinical application.

Indexed as

neonatal sepsisneonatal sepsis diagnostic scoreprediction modelseptic shockthromboelastometry

Identifiers

PMID36275071
PMCPMC9582514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.