Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275055›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

A performance review of novel adiposity indices for assessing insulin resistance in a pediatric Latino population.

Mac B McGraw, Lindsay N Kohler, Gabriel Q Shaibi, Lawrence J Mandarino, Dawn K Coletta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mac B McGrawDepartment of Physiology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Lindsay N KohlerCenter for Disparities in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Gabriel Q ShaibiCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Lawrence J MandarinoCenter for Disparities in Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Dawn K ColettaDepartment of Physiology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, United States.
University of Arizona · USArizona State University · USExos (United States) · US

Funding

Urban American Indian Youth Substance Use: Ecodevelopmental Influences P20MD002316 · NIMHD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MARSIGLIA, FLAVIO FRANCISCO · 2007 to 2016
$13.3M
Extracellular vesicle cargo and risk of NAFLD and NASH in U.S. youthR01DK127015 · NIDDK · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI Johanna K DiStefano, Gabriel Quantum Shaibi · 2022 to 2026
$3.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK127015NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD002316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Body mass index (BMI) percentile or BMI adjusted for age and sex is the most common anthropometric index to monitor and assess obesity in children. However, the ability of BMI to accurately predict insulin resistance (IR) in youth is debated. Determining the best method to noninvasively measure IR in the pediatric population is especially important due to the growing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is more likely to develop in people with IR. Therefore, this study analyzed the performance of BMI against newer anthropometric indices in assessing IR in a pediatric Latino identifying sample. Methods: We studied 127 pediatric Latino participants from the Arizona Insulin Resistance (AIR) registry and performed linear regression analyses between various measures of IR and adiposity indices, including body mass index (BMI), triponderal mass index (TMI), body adiposity index (BAI), pediatric body adiposity index (pBAI), a body shape index (ABSI), abdominal volume index (AVI), waist to height ratio (WtHR) and waist to hip ratio (WHR). Log transformations of each index adjusted for age and sex and IR were used for the linear regressions. Additionally, we generated receiver operating characteristics (ROC) from logistic regressions between HOMA-IR and HOMA2IR against the same indices. Results: Using the homeostatic assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), HOMA2IR, the quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI), fasting serum insulin, and FPG/FSI to measure IR, we showed that BMI adjusted for age and sex performs similarly to many of the newer indices in our sample. The correlation coefficients for pBAI [R2: 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.81, Conclusions: BMI adjusted for age and sex, despite its usage and simplicity, still stacks up well against newer indices in our Latino sample. Testing these indices across larger samples is necessary to generalize these findings and translate performance to adults.

Indexed as

adiposity indicesinsulin resistancelatino (Hispanic)obesitypediatricstype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36275055
PMCPMC9582658
OpenAlexW4302286478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.