ArticleSmart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Enabling effective breathing sound analysis for automated diagnosis of lung diseases.
Article in Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing MFCC Parameters for Breathing Phase Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Wireless Sensing for Health Management.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automated system for diagnosing pulmonary fibrosis using crackle analysis in recorded lung sounds based on iterative envelope mean fractal dimension filter.Physiological measurement · 2025Article
- BreathFinder: A Method for Non-Invasive Isolation of Respiratory Cycles Utilizing the Thoracic Respiratory Inductance Plethysmography Signal.Nature and science of sleep · 2024Article
- Telemedicine in Primary Practice in the Age of the COVID-19 Pandemic-Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, early diagnosis of lung diseases has attracted growing attention. Generally, monitoring the breathing sound is the traditional means for assessing the status of a patient's respiratory health through auscultation; for that a stethoscope is one of the clinical tools used by physicians for diagnosis of lung disease and anomalies. On the other hand, recent technological advances have made telehealth systems a practical and effective option for health status assessment and remote patient monitoring. The interest in telehealth solutions have further grown with the COVID-19 pandemic. These telehealth systems aim to provide increased safety and help to cope with the massive growth in healthcare demand. Particularly, employing acoustic sensors to collect breathing sound would enable real-time assessment and instantaneous detection of anomalies. However, existing work focuses on autonomous determination of respiratory rate which is not suitable for anomaly detection due to inability to deal with noisy data recording. This paper presents a novel approach for effective breathing sound analysis. We promote a new segmentation mechanism of the captured acoustic signals to identify breathing cycles in recorded sound signals. A scoring scheme is applied to qualify the segment based on the targeted respiratory illness by the overall breathing sound analysis. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach via experiments using published COPD datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.