Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36275007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Cognitive tasks propagate the neural entrainment in response to a visual 40 Hz stimulation in humans.

Elvira Khachatryan, Benjamin Wittevrongel, Mariska Reinartz, Ine Dauwe, Evelien Carrette, Alfred Meurs, Dirk Van Roost, Paul Boon, Marc M Van Hulle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elvira KhachatryanDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Benjamin WittevrongelDepartment of Neuroscience, Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mariska ReinartzLeuven Brain Institute (LBI), Leuven, Belgium.
Ine DauweDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Evelien CarretteDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Alfred MeursDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Dirk Van RoostDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Paul BoonDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marc M Van HulleDepartment of Neuroscience, Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's disease is one of the great challenges in the coming decades, and despite great efforts, a widely effective disease-modifying therapy in humans remains elusive. One particular promising non-pharmacological therapy that has received increased attention in recent years is based on the Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory stimulation (GENUS), a high-frequency neural response elicited by a visual and/or auditory stimulus at 40 Hz. While this has shown to be effective in animal models, studies on human participants have reported varying success. The current work hypothesizes that the varying success in humans is due to differences in cognitive workload during the GENUS sessions. Methods: We recruited a cohort of 15 participants who underwent a scalp-EEG recording as well as one epilepsy patient who was implanted with 50 subdural surface electrodes over temporo-occipital and temporo-basal cortex and 14 depth contacts that targeted the hippocampus and insula. All participants completed several GENUS sessions, in each of which a different cognitive task was performed. Results: We found that the inclusion of a cognitive task during the GENUS session not only has a positive effect on the strength and extent of the gamma entrainment, but also promotes the propagation of gamma entrainment to additional neural areas including deep ones such as hippocampus which were not recruited when no cognitive task was required from the participants. The latter is of particular interest given that the hippocampal complex is considered to be one of the primary targets for AD therapies. Discussion: This work introduces a possible improvement strategy for GENUS therapy that might contribute to increasing the efficacy of the therapy or shortening the time needed for the positive outcome.

Indexed as

cognitive declinecognitive taskelectrocorticography (ECoG)electroencephalography (EEG)Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory stimulation (GENUS)

Identifiers

PMID36275007
PMCPMC9582357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.