Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274816›Full record

ArticleMolecular vision2022

Oral administration of a dual ET

Bindu Kodati, Nolan R McGrady, Hayden B Jefferies, Dorota L Stankowska, Raghu R Krishnamoorthy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bindu KodatiUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX.
Nolan R McGradyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Hayden B JefferiesUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX.
Dorota L StankowskaUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX.
Raghu R KrishnamoorthyUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, North Texas Eye Research Institute, Fort Worth, TX.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

Training in the Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG020494 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI ROBERT Clinton BARBER, NATHALIE SUMIEN · 2002 to 2026
$6.9M
Mechanisms underlying endothelin mediated neurodegeneration in glaucomaR01EY028179 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI KRISHNAMOORTHY, RAGHU R · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028179NIA NIH HHS T32 AG020494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease associated with elevated intraocular pressure and characterized by optic nerve axonal degeneration, cupping of the optic disc, and loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). The endothelin (ET) system of vasoactive peptides (ET-1, ET-2, ET-3) and their G-protein coupled receptors (ET Methods: Male and female Brown Norway rats were subjected to the Morrison model of ocular hypertension by injection of hypertonic saline through the episcleral veins. Following IOP elevation, macitentan (5 mg/kg body wt) was administered orally 3 days per week, and rats with IOP elevation were maintained for 4 weeks. RGC function was determined by pattern electroretinography (PERG) at 2 and 4 weeks post-IOP elevation. Rats were euthanized by approved humane methods, and retinal flat mounts were generated and immunostained for the RGC-selective marker Brn3a. PPD-stained optic nerve sections were imaged by confocal microscopy. RGC and axon counts were conducted in a masked manner and compared between the treatment groups. Results: Significant protection against loss of RGCs and optic nerve axons was found following oral administration of macitentan in rats with elevated IOP. In addition, a protective trend for RGC function, as measured by pattern ERG analysis, was evident following macitentan treatment. Conclusions: Macitentan treatment had a neuroprotective effect on RGCs and their axons, independent of its IOP-lowering effect, suggesting that macitentan may complement existing treatments to prevent neurodegeneration during ocular hypertension. The findings presented have implications for the use of macitentan as an oral formulation to promote neuroprotection in glaucoma patients.

Indexed as

GlaucomaNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuroprotective AgentsOcular HypertensionAdministration, OralAnimalsAxonsDisease Models, AnimalEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsEndothelinsFemaleIntraocular PressureMaleNeuroprotectionPeptidesPyrimidinesEndothelin Receptor AntagonistsEndothelinsmacitentanNeuroprotective AgentsPeptidesPyrimidinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID36274816
PMCPMC9491150
OpenAlexW3096175903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.