Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274786›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2022

Hierarchical resampling for bagging in multistudy prediction with applications to human neurochemical sensing.

Gabriel Loewinger, Prasad Patil, Kenneth T Kishida, Giovanni Parmigiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multi-task learning for sparsity pattern heterogeneity: statistical and computational perspectives.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabriel LoewingerHarvard University.
Prasad PatilBoston University.
Kenneth T KishidaWake Forest School of Medicine.
Giovanni ParmigianiDana Farber Cancer Institute.

Funding

Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramUL1TR000142 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$31.8M
Wake Forest Translational Alcohol Research Center (WF-TARC)P50AA026117 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jeffrey L. Weiner · 2018 to 2026
$16.2M
BIOSTATISTICS/EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING GRANTS IN AIDST32AI007358 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Michael David Hughes · 1989 to 2026
$12.4M
Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001421 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, DAVID P · 2015 to 2023
$5.8M
Computational and electrochemical substrates of social decision-making in humansR01MH124115 · NIMH · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI GU, XIAOSI, KISHIDA, KENNETH TUCKER · 2020 to 2024
$5.1M
Dopaminergic encoding of counterfactual information in human striatumR01NS092701 · NINDS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI MONTAGUE, P READ · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Neuro-computational Approach to Determine a Neurochemical Basis of Mood and DepressionR01MH121099 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KISHIDA, KENNETH TUCKER · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Real-time neurochemical encoding of reward- and punishment-prediction errors and associated subjective experiences in humansR01DA048096 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KISHIDA, KENNETH TUCKER · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
Multi-Study Integer Programming Methods for Human VoltammeryF31DA052153 · NIDA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI LOEWINGER, GABRIEL · 2020 to 2021
$71k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001421NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000142NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA026117NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007358NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA052153NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048096NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121099NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH124115NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose the "study strap ensemble", which combines advantages of two common approaches to fitting prediction models when multiple training datasets ("studies") are available: pooling studies and fitting one model versus averaging predictions from multiple models each fit to individual studies. The study strap ensemble fits models to bootstrapped datasets, or "pseudo-studies." These are generated by resampling from multiple studies with a hierarchical resampling scheme that generalizes the randomized cluster bootstrap. The study strap is controlled by a tuning parameter that determines the proportion of observations to draw from each study. When the parameter is set to its lowest value, each pseudo-study is resampled from only a single study. When it is high, the study strap ignores the multi-study structure and generates pseudo-studies by merging the datasets and drawing observations like a standard bootstrap. We empirically show the optimal tuning value often lies in between, and prove that special cases of the study strap draw the merged dataset and the set of original studies as pseudo-studies. We extend the study strap approach with an ensemble weighting scheme that utilizes information in the distribution of the covariates of the test dataset. Our work is motivated by neuroscience experiments using real-time neurochemical sensing during awake behavior in humans. Current techniques to perform this kind of research require measurements from an electrode placed in the brain during awake neurosurgery and rely on prediction models to estimate neurotransmitter concentrations from the electrical measurements recorded by the electrode. These models are trained by combining multiple datasets that are collected

Indexed as

Domain AdaptationDomain GeneralizationNeurosciencePrimary 62P10Transfer Learning

Identifiers

PMID36274786
PMCPMC9586160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.