Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274744›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Effects of laccase and lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation quality, nutrient composition, enzymatic hydrolysis, and bacterial community of alfalfa silage.

Xueyan Bao, Haoran Feng, Gang Guo, Wenjie Huo, Qinghong Li, Qingfang Xu, Qiang Liu, Cong Wang, Lei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xueyan BaoCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Haoran FengCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Gang GuoCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Wenjie HuoCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Qinghong LiCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Qingfang XuCollege of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Qiang LiuCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Cong WangCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Lei ChenCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi, China.
Shanxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensiling has long been as a mainstream technology of preserving forage for ruminant production. This study investigated the effects of bioaugmented ensiling with laccase and

Indexed as

alfalfa silagebacterial communitybio-additivesenzymatic hydrolysisfermentation quality

Identifiers

PMID36274744
PMCPMC9582240
OpenAlexW4303192443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.