Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274695›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

Phytomicrobiome communications: Novel implications for stress resistance in plants.

Kanika Khanna, Sukhmeen Kaur Kohli, Nandni Sharma, Jaspreet Kour, Kamini Devi, Tamanna Bhardwaj, Shalini Dhiman, Arun Dev Singh, Neerja Sharma, Anket Sharma and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Optimization of auxin production by Streptomyces californicus CLV91 for plant growth promotion.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kanika KhannaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Sukhmeen Kaur KohliDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Nandni SharmaDepartment of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Jaspreet KourDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Kamini DeviDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Tamanna BhardwajDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Shalini DhimanDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Arun Dev SinghDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Neerja SharmaDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Anket SharmaState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Puja OhriDepartment of Zoology, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Renu BhardwajDepartment of Botanical and Environmental Sciences, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India.
Parvaiz AhmadDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pravej AlamDepartment of Biology, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Thamer H AlbalawiDepartment of Biology, College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Guru Nanak Dev University · INPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SADAV University · INKing Saud University · SAZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agricultural sector is a foremost contributing factor in supplying food at the global scale. There are plethora of biotic as well as abiotic stressors that act as major constraints for the agricultural sector in terms of global food demand, quality, and security. Stresses affect rhizosphere and their communities, root growth, plant health, and productivity. They also alter numerous plant physiological and metabolic processes. Moreover, they impact transcriptomic and metabolomic changes, causing alteration in root exudates and affecting microbial communities. Since the evolution of hazardous pesticides and fertilizers, productivity has experienced elevation but at the cost of impeding soil fertility thereby causing environmental pollution. Therefore, it is crucial to develop sustainable and safe means for crop production. The emergence of various pieces of evidence depicting the alterations and abundance of microbes under stressed conditions proved to be beneficial and outstanding for maintaining plant legacy and stimulating their survival. Beneficial microbes offer a great potential for plant growth during stresses in an economical manner. Moreover, they promote plant growth with regulating phytohormones, nutrient acquisition, siderophore synthesis, and induce antioxidant system. Besides, acquired or induced systemic resistance also counteracts biotic stresses. The phytomicrobiome exploration is crucial to determine the growth-promoting traits, colonization, and protection of plants from adversities caused by stresses. Further, the intercommunications among rhizosphere through a direct/indirect manner facilitate growth and form complex network. The phytomicrobiome communications are essential for promoting sustainable agriculture where microbes act as ecological engineers for environment. In this review, we have reviewed our building knowledge about the role of microbes in plant defense and stress-mediated alterations within the phytomicrobiomes. We have depicted the defense biome concept that infers the design of phytomicrobiome communities and their fundamental knowledge about plant-microbe interactions for developing plant probiotics.

Indexed as

defense mechanismsmetabolomicsmetagenomicsphytomicrobiomeplant probioticsrhizospherestresses

Identifiers

PMID36274695
PMCPMC9583171
OpenAlexW4302304915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.