Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274668›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology open2022

Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults Using Bimodal Hearing Configurations.

Jourdan T Holder, Meredith A Holcomb, Hillary Snapp, Robert F Labadie, Jantien Vroegop, Christine Rocca, Mohamed Salah Elgandy, Camille Dunn, René H Gifford

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06051006 (The Value of Electrical Stapedial Reflex Thresholds), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06051006 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Value of Electrical Stapedial Reflex Thresholds (eSRTs) in Determining Upper Stimulation Levels in Cochlear Implant Maps

TypeobservationalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2023 to 2026Enrolled30ConditionsProfound Hearing Loss, Cochlear ImplantsArmsESR and ECAP measurements, Device setting, Speech audiometry, Intelligibility in noise test, Cochlear implant datalogging, speech audiometry test, FraSimat test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal and speech outcomes in bimodal cochlear implant users: The effect of device delay mismatch.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The"symbiotic"regulation approach in bimodal hearing adults.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Benefits of Bimodal Stimulation to Speech Perception in Noise and Silence.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jourdan T HolderVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Meredith A HolcombUniversity of Miami, Miami, FL.
Hillary SnappUniversity of Miami, Miami, FL.
Robert F LabadieMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Jantien VroegopErasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christine RoccaGuy's and St. Thomas' Hearing Implant Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Mohamed Salah ElgandyUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Camille DunnUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
René H GiffordVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of Miami · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USErasmus MC · NLMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Inyong Choi · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinics are treating a growing number of patients with greater amounts of residual hearing. These patients often benefit from a bimodal hearing configuration in which acoustic input from a hearing aid on 1 ear is combined with electrical stimulation from a cochlear implant on the other ear. The current guidelines aim to review the literature and provide best practice recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of individuals with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who may benefit from bimodal hearing configurations. Specifically, the guidelines review: benefits of bimodal listening, preoperative and postoperative cochlear implant evaluation and programming, bimodal hearing aid fitting, contralateral routing of signal considerations, bimodal treatment for tinnitus, and aural rehabilitation recommendations.

Indexed as

BimodalCochlear implantHearing aid

Identifiers

PMID36274668
PMCPMC9581116
OpenAlexW4289926429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.