Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274654›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Exploring approaches for predictive cancer patient digital twins: Opportunities for collaboration and innovation.

Eric A Stahlberg, Mohamed Abdel-Rahman, Boris Aguilar, Alireza Asadpoure, Robert A Beckman, Lynn L Borkon, Jeffrey N Bryan, Colleen M Cebulla, Young Hwan Chang, Ansu Chatterjee and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Digital Twin Technology In Radiology.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ZENN: A thermodynamics-inspired computational framework for heterogeneous data-driven modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Eric A StahlbergCancer Data Science Initiatives, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States.
Mohamed Abdel-RahmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Boris AguilarInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Alireza AsadpoureDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Robert A BeckmanInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington DC, United States.
Lynn L BorkonCancer Data Science Initiatives, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, United States.
Jeffrey N BryanDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Colleen M CebullaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Young Hwan ChangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and OHSU Center for Spatial Systems Biomedicine (OCSSB), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Ansu ChatterjeeSchool of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Jun DengDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Sepideh DolatshahiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA, United States.
Olivier GevaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine and Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Emily J GreenspanCenter for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Wenrui HaoDepartment of Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine and Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
Pamela R JacksonMathematical NeuroOncology Lab, Precision Neurotherapeutics Innovation Program, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Marieke KuijjerComputational Biology and Systems Medicine Group, Centre for Molecular Medicine Norway University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Adrian LeeDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Paul MacklinDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Subha MadhavanInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington DC, United States.
Matthew D McCoyInnovation Center for Biomedical Informatics, Georgetown University, Washington DC, United States.
Navid Mohammad MirzaeiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Talayeh RazzaghiSchool of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Heber L RochaDepartment of Intelligent Systems Engineering, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Leili ShahriyariDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
Ilya ShmulevichInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, United States.
Daniel G StoverDivision of Medical Oncology and Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, United States.
Yi SunDepartment of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Tanveer Syeda-MahmoodAlmaden Research Center, IBM Research, San Jose, CA, United States.
Jinhua WangInstitute for Health Informatics and the Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Qi WangDepartment of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Ioannis ZervantonakisDepartment of Bioengineering, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Georgetown University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USIndiana University Bloomington · USInstitute for Systems Biology · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of South Carolina · USIBM Research - Almaden · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USNational Institutes of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USPennsylvania State University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Maternal Morbidity and Mortality: Risk Factors, Early Detection and Personalized InterventionUL1TR001409 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GONDRE-LEWIS, MARJORIE C, MELLMAN, THOMAS A · 2015 to 2024
$37.8M
Multi-scale modeling of glioma for the prediction of treatment response, treatment monitoring and treatment allocationR01CA260271 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001409NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260271NIH HHS 75N91019D00024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are rapidly approaching a future in which cancer patient digital twins will reach their potential to predict cancer prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in individual patients. This will be realized based on advances in high performance computing, computational modeling, and an expanding repertoire of observational data across multiple scales and modalities. In 2020, the US National Cancer Institute, and the US Department of Energy, through a trans-disciplinary research community at the intersection of advanced computing and cancer research, initiated team science collaborative projects to explore the development and implementation of predictive Cancer Patient Digital Twins. Several diverse pilot projects were launched to provide key insights into important features of this emerging landscape and to determine the requirements for the development and adoption of cancer patient digital twins. Projects included exploring approaches to using a large cohort of digital twins to perform deep phenotyping and plan treatments at the individual level, prototyping self-learning digital twin platforms, using adaptive digital twin approaches to monitor treatment response and resistance, developing methods to integrate and fuse data and observations across multiple scales, and personalizing treatment based on cancer type. Collectively these efforts have yielded increased insights into the opportunities and challenges facing cancer patient digital twin approaches and helped define a path forward. Given the rapidly growing interest in patient digital twins, this manuscript provides a valuable early progress report of several CPDT pilot projects commenced in common, their overall aims, early progress, lessons learned and future directions that will increasingly involve the broader research community.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecancer patientdigital twinsmachine learningmathematical modelingoncologypredictive medicine

Identifiers

PMID36274654
PMCPMC9586248
OpenAlexW4302304621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.