Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274641›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2023

Association between ultra-processed foods consumption and micronutrient intake and diet quality in Iranian adults: a multicentric study.

Fahimeh Haghighatdoost, Parisa Hajihashemi, Noushin Mohammadifard, Farid Najafi, Hossein Farshidi, Masoud Lotfizadeh, Tooba Kazemi, Simin Karimi, Shahin Shirani, Kamal Solati and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fahimeh HaghighatdoostInterventional Cardiology Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-6267
Parisa HajihashemiIsfahan Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Noushin MohammadifardIsfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 81745-15, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1776-1060
Farid NajafiResearch Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Hossein FarshidiHormozgan Cardiovascular Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandarabbas, Iran.
Masoud LotfizadehSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Tooba KazemiCardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Simin KarimiHeart Failure Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Shahin ShiraniHypertension Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Kamal SolatiDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
Nizal SarrafzadeganIsfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 81745-15, Isfahan, Iran.
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRShahrekord University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IRHormozgan University of Medical Sciences · IRKermanshah University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify ultra-processed foods (UPF) contribution to daily energy and nutrient intake in Iranians and examine whether UPF intake is associated with nutrient profile and diet quality.

designIn this cross-sectional study, a validated FFQ was used to evaluate usual dietary intake over the preceding year. NOVA system was applied to categorise foods based on their levels of processing. Diet quality was evaluated using the nutrient adequacy ratio (NAR), Nutrient Rich Food Index (NRF) and hybrid nutrient density.

settingThe LIPOKAP study conducted in five cities of Iran (Isfahan, Birjand, Bandar Abbas, Kermanshah and Shahrekord).

participantsA total of 1994 adults aged ≥18 years were recruited using stratified multistage random cluster sampling method.

resultsUPF were responsible for 8·5 % of daily energy intake. In the adjusted model, UPF consumption was inversely associated with carbohydrate, protein, refined and whole grains, fibre, fruit and meat, but was positively linked to energy, total fat, saturated and trans fatty acids and cholesterol. Compared with those in the lowest tertile, individuals in the highest tertile of UPF had smaller NAR for Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, phosphorus, thiamin, niacin, folate and vitamin C. Both NRF and hybrid nutrient density decreased when the share of daily energy intake from UPF increased.

conclusionThe higher consumption of UPF is associated with poorer diet quality and lower nutrient intake. It is recommended that UPF be replaced with minimally processed foods to improve diet quality and nutrient profile.

Indexed as

Diet qualityHybrid nutrient densityMicronutrientNutrient adequacyUltra-processed food

Identifiers

PMID36274641
PMCPMC13076090
OpenAlexW4307180690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.