ArticleEuropean journal of ophthalmology2023
Analysis of higher-order aberrations in relation to the clinical outcome of an enhanced monofocal IOL.
Article in European journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of defocus curves of monofocal, enhanced monofocal and extended depth of focus IOLs.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparing Visual Performance and Subjective Outcomes with an Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lens When Targeted for Emmetropia or Monovision.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Trial
- Association of preoperative corneal spherical aberration with intermediate-to-near visual acuity in enhanced monofocal intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Functional Intermediate Vision and Pupil-Dependent Optical Behavior After Implantation of a Segmented Refractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Visual Outcomes with Enhanced Monofocal and Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Field Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Visual efficacy after implantation of monofocal intraocular lens on one eye and higher-order aspheric IOL on the other eye.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes with a new diffractive multifocal intraocular lens optimized by the dynamic light utilization algorithm.Eye (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Enhanced Monofocal IOLs Improve Patient Satisfaction in Phaco-Vitrectomy for ERM.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of an Enhanced and Conventional Monofocal IOL in Patients with Early and Intermediate Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- A comparative study and review of visual outcomes with enhanced versus standard monofocal intraocular lenses following cataract surgery.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of visual acuity and optical quality between higher-order aspheric monofocal and standard introcular lenses.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Two Monofocal, Aspheric Intraocular Lenses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical outcomes and optical performance of a new segmental refractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Visual Outcomes, Postoperative Angle Alpha, and Angle Kappa After Implantation of Isofocal Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a New Enhanced Monofocal IOL and a Conventional Monofocal IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Positioning of enhanced monofocal intraocular lenses between conventional monofocal and extended depth of focus lenses: a scoping review.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, Patient Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence After Bilateral Implantation of the Synergy™ Intraocular Lens.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Head-to-Head Comparison of Intermediate Vision of Two Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Biometric Indicators for Maximizing Intermediate Vision with a Monofocal IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyse higher-order aberrations of an enhanced monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) in relation to the clinical outcome compared to a monofocal aspheric IOL.
settingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
designProspective, monocentric, controlled, non-randomized, two-armed study.
methodsAfter phacoemulsification, a total of 30 patients (60 eyes) were bilaterally implanted with either TECNIS Eyhance IOL model ICB00 (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.) or TECNIS Monofocal 1-Piece IOL model ZCB00 (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.) in 30 eyes each. Assessments were performed 1 and 3 months after surgery including refraction, uncorrected and best-corrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity, defocus curves, contrast sensitivities under photopic, mesopic and mesopic conditions with glare, higher-order aberrations (HOAs) at pupil sizes of 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm and patient satisfaction.
resultsAt 3-month follow-up, measurements of HOAs revealed significant higher negative internal and ocular primary spherical aberrations in the ICB00 group at pupil sizes of 5, 4, 3 and 2 mm. The ICB00 showed significant better results in intermediate and near visual acuity, but no difference in distance visual acuity. No significant difference was found in contrast sensitivities at any condition or spatial frequency. Spectacle independence was significant better without significant higher rates of dysphotopsia in the ICB00 group.
conclusionsHigher negative spherical aberrations in the ICB00 group at all measured pupil sizes appear to lead to a superior clinical outcome in intermediate and near vision compared to the ZCB00 group without compromising contrast sensitivity or distance visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.