ArticleThoracic cancer2022
An exploration of LAF-bTMB as a predictor for the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combined with chemotherapy is one of the standards of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver mutations. However, the biomarker of combination therapy is still unknown. Although previous studies have confirmed that low allele frequency adjusted blood-based tumor mutational burden (LAF-bTMB) is associated with the efficacy of ICI monotherapy, there has been no report on the correlation between the efficacy of LAF-bTMB and ICI combined chemotherapy. This study aimed to explore whether LAF-bTMB can be used as a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.
methodsThis study enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC and who received ICI combined with chemotherapy for first-line therapy from May 2020 to December 2021 at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. Clinical information, treatment information, survival data, and peripheral blood samples of every patient before treatment were collected. Next-generation sequencing was performed on plasma samples to estimate bTMB and LAF-bTMB.
resultsA total of 42 patients with NSCLC were enrolled. In this cohort, 19 patients achieved partial response (PR), and the objective response rate (ORR) was 45.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of all patients was 13.4 months (95% CI, 7.49-19.72). Both PFS and the overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in the responder (R) group than in the non-responder (NR) group (median PFS, 16.4 months vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.028; median OS, NE vs. 9.3 months, p = 0.016). There was no significant difference in bTMB and LAF-BTMB between the R and NR group. The ORR of patients with LAF-bTMB≤8muts/Mb was significantly higher than that of patients with LAF-bTMB >8muts/Mb (ORR, 61% vs. 26%, respectively, p = 0.033). When LAF-bTMB ≤8muts/Mb or > 20muts/Mb, ORR was significantly higher than that of patients with LAF-bTMB between 8 and 20muts/Mb (ORR were 57% and 21%, p = 0.047). No correlation has been found between LAF-bTMB and PFS or OS.
conclusionsThis study confirmed that neither bTMB nor LAF-bTMB is feasible as a potential predictor of first-line immunochemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. More suitable biomarkers need to be explored to screen patients with better efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.