Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274172›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2022

Effects of rapid fluid infusion on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Armin A Quispe-Cornejo, Ana L Alves da Cunha, Hassane Njimi, Wasineenart Mongkolpun, Ana L Valle-Martins, Mónica Arébalo-López, Jacques Creteur, Jean-Louis Vincent

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Use of COAnnals of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Changes in central venous-to-arterial PCOCritical care (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Armin A Quispe-CornejoDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Ana L Alves da CunhaDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital da Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.
Hassane NjimiDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Wasineenart MongkolpunDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Ana L Valle-MartinsDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Mater Dei, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Mónica Arébalo-LópezDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Univalle Norte, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Jacques CreteurDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. jlvincent@intensive.org.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BEInstituto Boliviano de Ciencia y Tecnología Nuclear · BOMater Dei Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid fluid administration may decrease hemoglobin concentration (Hb) by a diluting effect, which could limit the increase in oxygen delivery (DO

methodsOur protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020165146). We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase from inception until February 15, 2022. We selected studies that reported Hb before and after rapid fluid administration (bolus fluid given over less than 120 min) with crystalloids and/or colloids in adults. Exclusion criteria were studies that included bleeding patients, or used transfusions or extracorporeal circulation procedures. Studies were divided according to whether they involved non-acutely ill or acutely ill (surgical/trauma, sepsis, circulatory shock or severe hypovolemia, and mixed conditions) subjects. The mean Hb difference and, where reported, the DO

resultsSixty-five studies met our inclusion criteria (40 in non-acutely ill and 25 in acutely ill subjects), with a total of 2794 participants. Risk of bias was assessed as "low" for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 'low to moderate' for non-RCTs. Across 63 studies suitable for meta-analysis, the Hb decreased significantly by a mean of 1.33 g/dL [95% CI - 1.45 to - 1.12; p < 0.001; I

conclusionsHb decreased consistently after rapid fluid administration with moderate certainty of evidence. This effect may limit the positive effects of fluid challenges on DO

Indexed as

Critical IllnessSepsisAdultColloidsHemoglobinsHumansOxygenColloidsHemoglobinsOxygenFluid challengeFluid resuscitationHematocritHemodilutionOxygen delivery

Identifiers

PMID36274172
PMCPMC9588219
OpenAlexW4307102501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.