ArticleScientific reports2022
Slipping mechanics during walking along curved paths depend on the biomechanical context at slip onset.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Turns and Turn-Related Falls: Stepping on a Rotating Platform as a Potential Approach to Foster Adapted Muscular and Neural Plasticity in Fragile Persons and Patients with Motor Impairment.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of unexpected underfoot perturbations during turning on measures of mediolateral stability and corresponding recovery strategies.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026Article
- Curvilinear walking elevates fall risk and modulates slip and compensatory step attributes after unconstrained human slips.The Journal of experimental biology · 2024Article
- The choice of reference frame alters interpretations of turning gait and stability.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Curvilinear walking is common, causing limb- and radius-dependent asymmetries that distinguish it from straight walking and elevated friction demands that increase slip-and-fall risk. However, it is unclear how aspects of curvilinear walking influence the slip perturbations experienced. We cross-sectionally examined how three biomechanical slip contexts (slip onset phase, slipped foot relative to the path, path radius) influence slip direction, distance, and peak velocity. Eighteen young adults experienced unconstrained inside or outside foot slips during early, mid-, or late stance while following 1.0- or 2.0-m radius semicircular paths. We derived slip mechanics from motion-capture data and assessed their dependence on slip context using mixed-effects models. As slip onset phase progressed, slip directions exhibited an anterior-to-posterior transition, shortened mediolaterally, and accelerated anteroposteriorly. The slipped foot modified the direction transition, with inside and outside foot slips moving contralaterally and ipsilaterally, respectively. Inside foot slips were shorter and slower mediolaterally and longer anteroposteriorly than outside foot slips. Increasing path radius caused slips with greater mediolateral direction components. We show a range of context-dependent slips are possible, likely due to instantaneous magnitudes and orientations of shear ground reaction forces. Our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of walking slips, which fall prevention methods can leverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.