ArticleBrain structure & function2022
The impact of aging on human brain network target controllability.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Age-related differences in network controllability are mitigated by redundancy in large-scale brain networks.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Age-related differences in structural and resting-state functional brain network organization across the adult lifespan: A cross-sectional study.Aging brain · 2024Article
- Controlling target brain regions by optimal selection of input nodes.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Brain disconnections refine the relationship between brain structure and function.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how few distributed areas can steer large-scale brain activity is a fundamental question that has practical implications, which range from inducing specific patterns of behavior to counteracting disease. Recent endeavors based on network controllability provided fresh insights into the potential ability of single regions to influence whole brain dynamics through the underlying structural connectome. However, controlling the entire brain activity is often unfeasible and might not always be necessary. The question whether single areas can control specific target subsystems remains crucial, albeit still poorly explored. Furthermore, the structure of the brain network exhibits progressive changes across the lifespan, but little is known about the possible consequences in the controllability properties. To address these questions, we adopted a novel target controllability approach that quantifies the centrality of brain nodes in controlling specific target anatomo-functional systems. We then studied such target control centrality in human connectomes obtained from healthy individuals aged from 5 to 85. Main results showed that the sensorimotor system has a high influencing capacity, but it is difficult for other areas to influence it. Furthermore, we reported that target control centrality varies with age and that temporal-parietal regions, whose cortical thinning is crucial in dementia-related diseases, exhibit lower values in older people. By simulating targeted attacks, such as those occurring in focal stroke, we showed that the ipsilesional hemisphere is the most affected one regardless of the damaged area. Notably, such degradation in target control centrality was more evident in younger people, thus supporting early-vulnerability hypotheses after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.