ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2023
Direct Risk Assessment From Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Explainable Deep Learning.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Patients with ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Evolution of Risk Measurement Techniques and Assessment of Their Effectiveness (Review).Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The importance of developing multiparametric prognostic scores to stratify coronary risk by means of artificial intelligence.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- A pipeline for developing deep learning prognostic prediction models in cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cross-institutional validation of a polar map-free 3D deep learning model for obstructive coronary artery disease prediction using myocardial perfusion imaging: insights into generalizability and bias.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging: Novel Advances, Emerging Techniques, and Recent Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Emerging Applications of Positron Emission Tomography in Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The role of deep learning in myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosis and prognosis: A systematic review.iScience · 2024Review
- Machine learning for prognostic prediction in coronary artery disease with SPECT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EJNMMI research · 2024Review
- The Updated Registry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Next-Generation SPECT (REFINE SPECT 2.0).Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- Improving cardiovascular risk prediction with machine learning: a focus on perivascular adipose tissue characteristics.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Article
- Review
- Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- A review of evaluation approaches for explainable AI with applications in cardiology.Artificial intelligence review · 2024Article
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Advancing the Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Heart and Vascular Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Deep learning-enhanced nuclear medicine SPECT imaging applied to cardiac studies.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Preprocedural CT angiography and machine learning for mortality prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is frequently used to provide risk stratification, but methods to improve the accuracy of these predictions are needed.
objectivesThe authors developed an explainable deep learning (DL) model (HARD MACE [major adverse cardiac events]-DL) for the prediction of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and validated its performance in large internal and external testing groups.
methodsPatients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography MPI were included, with 20,401 patients in the training and internal testing group (5 sites) and 9,019 in the external testing group (2 different sites). HARD MACE-DL uses myocardial perfusion, motion, thickening, and phase polar maps combined with age, sex, and cardiac volumes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI. Prognostic accuracy was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsDuring internal testing, patients with normal perfusion and elevated HARD MACE-DL risk were at higher risk than patients with abnormal perfusion and low HARD MACE-DL risk (annualized event rate, 2.9% vs 1.2%; P < 0.001). Patients in the highest quartile of HARD MACE-DL score had an annual rate of death or MI (4.8%) 10-fold higher than patients in the lowest quartile (0.48% per year). In external testing, the AUC for HARD MACE-DL (0.73; 95% CI: 0.71-0.75) was higher than a logistic regression model (AUC: 0.70), stress total perfusion deficit (TPD) (AUC: 0.65), and ischemic TPD (AUC: 0.63; all P < 0.01). Calibration, a measure of how well predicted risk matches actual risk, was excellent in both groups (Brier score, 0.079 for internal and 0.070 for external).
conclusionsThe DL model predicts death or MI directly from MPI, by estimating patient-level risk with good calibration and improved accuracy compared with traditional quantitative approaches. The model incorporates mechanisms to explain to the physician which image regions contribute to the adverse event prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.