Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36274041›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2023

Direct Risk Assessment From Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using Explainable Deep Learning.

Ananya Singh, Robert J H Miller, Yuka Otaki, Paul Kavanagh, Michael T Hauser, Evangelos Tzolos, Jacek Kwiecinski, Serge Van Kriekinge, Chih-Chun Wei, Tali Sharir and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Cardiology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Updated Registry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with Next-Generation SPECT (REFINE SPECT 2.0).Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Holistic AI analysis of hybrid cardiac perfusion images for mortality prediction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Ananya SinghDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Robert J H MillerDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Yuka OtakiDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Paul KavanaghDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Michael T HauserDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Oklahoma Heart Hospital, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Evangelos TzolosDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jacek KwiecinskiDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology, Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Serge Van KriekingeDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Chih-Chun WeiDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Tali SharirDepartment of Nuclear Cardiology, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Nuclear Cardiology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba, Israel.
Andrew J EinsteinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Mathews B FishOregon Heart and Vascular Institute, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Springfield, Oregon, USA.
Terrence D RuddyDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Philipp A KaufmannDivision of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Albert J SinusasSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Edward J MillerSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Timothy M BatemanCardiovascular Imaging Technologies LLC, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Sharmila DorbalaDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Marcelo Di CarliDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joanna X LiangDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Cathleen HuangDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Donghee HanDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Damini DeyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Daniel S BermanDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Piotr J SlomkaDivision of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA; Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: Piotr.Slomka@cshs.org.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USYale University · USBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILHeart Imaging Technologies (United States) · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USOklahoma Heart Hospital · USProvidence Sacred Heart Medical Center · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Quantitative Prediction of Disease and Outcomes from Next Generation SPECT and CTR01HL089765 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2007 to 2021
$6.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is frequently used to provide risk stratification, but methods to improve the accuracy of these predictions are needed.

objectivesThe authors developed an explainable deep learning (DL) model (HARD MACE [major adverse cardiac events]-DL) for the prediction of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and validated its performance in large internal and external testing groups.

methodsPatients undergoing single-photon emission computed tomography MPI were included, with 20,401 patients in the training and internal testing group (5 sites) and 9,019 in the external testing group (2 different sites). HARD MACE-DL uses myocardial perfusion, motion, thickening, and phase polar maps combined with age, sex, and cardiac volumes. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality or nonfatal MI. Prognostic accuracy was evaluated using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

resultsDuring internal testing, patients with normal perfusion and elevated HARD MACE-DL risk were at higher risk than patients with abnormal perfusion and low HARD MACE-DL risk (annualized event rate, 2.9% vs 1.2%; P < 0.001). Patients in the highest quartile of HARD MACE-DL score had an annual rate of death or MI (4.8%) 10-fold higher than patients in the lowest quartile (0.48% per year). In external testing, the AUC for HARD MACE-DL (0.73; 95% CI: 0.71-0.75) was higher than a logistic regression model (AUC: 0.70), stress total perfusion deficit (TPD) (AUC: 0.65), and ischemic TPD (AUC: 0.63; all P < 0.01). Calibration, a measure of how well predicted risk matches actual risk, was excellent in both groups (Brier score, 0.079 for internal and 0.070 for external).

conclusionsThe DL model predicts death or MI directly from MPI, by estimating patient-level risk with good calibration and improved accuracy compared with traditional quantitative approaches. The model incorporates mechanisms to explain to the physician which image regions contribute to the adverse event prediction.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDeep LearningMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Perfusion ImagingHumansPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photonartificial intelligencedeep learningmyocardial perfusion imagingprognosisrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID36274041
PMCPMC10980287
OpenAlexW4306827332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.