Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273996›Full record

ReviewAcademic radiology2023

Multiparametric Quantitative Imaging in Risk Prediction: Recommendations for Data Acquisition, Technical Performance Assessment, and Model Development and Validation.

Erich P Huang, Gene Pennello, Nandita M deSouza, Xiaofeng Wang, Andrew J Buckler, Paul E Kinahan, Huiman X Barnhart, Jana G Delfino, Timothy J Hall, David L Raunig and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. A point system to predict the future risk of obesity in 10-year-old children.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Erich P HuangDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, MSC 9735, Bethesda, MD 20892-9735. Electronic address: erich.huang@nih.gov.
Gene PennelloCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration.
Nandita M deSouzaDivision of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research (London, UK), European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance.
Xiaofeng WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Andrew J BucklerElucid Bioimaging, Inc.
Paul E KinahanDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington.
Huiman X BarnhartDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University.
Jana G DelfinoCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, US Food and Drug Administration.
Timothy J HallDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
David L RaunigData Science Institute, Statistical and Quantitative Sciences, Takeda.
Alexander R GuimaraesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Sciences University.
Nancy A ObuchowskiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combinations of multiple quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) are often able to predict the likelihood of an event of interest such as death or disease recurrence more effectively than single imaging measurements can alone. The development of such multiparametric quantitative imaging and evaluation of its fitness of use differs from the analogous processes for individual QIBs in several key aspects. A computational procedure to combine the QIB values into a model output must be specified. The output must also be reproducible and be shown to have reasonably strong ability to predict the risk of an event of interest. Attention must be paid to statistical issues not often encountered in the single QIB scenario, including overfitting and bias in the estimates of model performance. This is the fourth in a five-part series on statistical methodology for assessing the technical performance of multiparametric quantitative imaging. Considerations for data acquisition are discussed and recommendations from the literature on methodology to construct and evaluate QIB-based models for risk prediction are summarized. The findings in the literature upon which these recommendations are based are demonstrated through simulation studies. The concepts in this manuscript are applied to a real-life example involving prediction of major adverse cardiac events using automated plaque analysis.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingBiomarkersComputer SimulationHumansBiomarkersmodel developmentmodel validationquantitative imagingtechnical performance

Identifiers

PMID36273996
PMCPMC9825642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.