ReviewTransfusion medicine reviews2022
Changing Paradigms in ITP Management: Newer Tools for an Old Disease.
Review in Transfusion medicine reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient and Physician Experiences in Immune Thrombocytopenia.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- A Clinician Perspective for a Personalized Approach to Management of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenia with Targeted Therapies Alone or in Combination.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- 2025 update on clinical trials in immune thrombocytopenia.American journal of hematology · 2024Review
- Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Cost Analysis of Immune Thrombocytopenia in Spain between 2014 and 2020: A Population-based Study.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Article
- Avatrombopag for adults with early versus chronic immune thrombocytopenia.American journal of hematology · 2024Observational
- Novel therapeutics and future directions for refractory immune thrombocytopenia.British journal of haematology · 2023Review
- Immune thrombocytopenia: Evolving mechanistic understanding and clinical development of new therapies.Tzu chi medical journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia that may be accompanied clinically by bleeding and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). While corticosteroids, splenectomy, and various immunosuppressants (used off-label) have served as historical mainstays of ITP treatment, their use is associated with adverse effects and morbidity. Over the last 15 years, the advent of the thrombopoietin receptor agonists has revolutionized the management of chronic ITP with high response rates, durable responses, and minimal adverse effects in most patients. With four agents now FDA-approved to manage chronic ITP, there is a renewed emphasis on improving HRQoL and minimizing the toxicities associated with traditional therapies. Promising agents with diverse mechanisms of action, ranging from those targeting Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase to the neonatal Fc receptor, are currently under investigation. This review highlights recent landmark clinical trials which have made significant impacts on ITP management and ongoing drug development. In critically analyzing studies of relevance, we illustrate the changing paradigms of ITP management and how the field is advancing beyond traditional therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.