Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273770›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2022

Neural resources shift under Methylphenidate: A computational approach to examine anxiety-cognition interplay.

Manish Saggar, Jennifer Bruno, Claudie Gaillard, Leonardo Claudino, Monique Ernst

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Manish SaggarDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: saggar@stanford.edu.
Jennifer BrunoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Claudie GaillardSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Leonardo ClaudinoSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Monique ErnstSection on Neurobiology of Fear and Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: ernstm@mail.nih.gov.
National Institute of Mental Health · USStanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Only time will tell: a computational psychiatry approach to model temporal transitions in brain activity as a lens towards developing better diagnostic nosology for psychiatric illnessDP2MH119735 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SAGGAR, MANISH · 2018 to 2018
$2.4M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH119735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reciprocal interplay between anxiety and cognition is well documented. Anxiety negatively impacts cognition, while cognitive engagement can down-regulate anxiety. The brain mechanisms and dynamics underlying such interplay are not fully understood. To study this question, we experimentally and orthogonally manipulated anxiety (using a threat of shock paradigm) and cognition (using methylphenidate; MPH). The effects of these manipulations on the brain and behavior were evaluated in 50 healthy participants (25 MPH, 25 placebo), using an n-back working memory fMRI task (with low and high load conditions). Behaviorally, improved response accuracy was observed as a main effect of the drug across all conditions. We employed two approaches to understand the neural mechanisms underlying MPH-based cognitive enhancement in safe and threat conditions. First, we performed a hypothesis-driven computational analysis using a mathematical framework to examine how MPH putatively affects cognitive enhancement in the face of induced anxiety across two levels of cognitive load. Second, we performed an exploratory data analysis using Topological Data Analysis (TDA)-based Mapper to examine changes in spatiotemporal brain activity across the entire cortex. Both approaches provided converging evidence that MPH facilitated greater differential engagement of neural resources (brain activity) across low and high working memory load conditions. Furthermore, load-based differential management of neural resources reflects enhanced efficiency that is most powerful during higher load and induced anxiety conditions. Overall, our results provide novel insights regarding brain mechanisms that facilitate cognitive enhancement under MPH and, in future research, may be used to help mitigate anxiety-related cognitive underperformance.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateAnxietyCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidate

Identifiers

PMID36273770
PMCPMC9772074
OpenAlexW4306928314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.