Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273394›Full record

ArticleMovement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society2023

Temporal Dynamics of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.

Paul Moulaire, Pierre Emmanuel Poulet, Emilien Petit, Thomas Klockgether, Alexandra Durr, Tetsuo Ashisawa, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, READISCA Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Spastic Ataxia Composite (SPAXCOM): A Scale to Evaluate the Progression of Subjects with Spasticity and Ataxia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Sensitivity of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Progression over Six Months in Early Spinocerebellar Ataxia.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paul MoulaireSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INRIA, CNRS, APHP, Paris, 75013, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3334-6035
Pierre Emmanuel PouletSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, INSERM, INRIA, CNRS, APHP, Paris, France.
Emilien PetitSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, INSERM, INRIA, CNRS, APHP, Paris, France.
Thomas KlockgetherGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Alexandra DurrSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, INSERM, INRIA, CNRS, APHP, Paris, France.
Tetsuo AshisawaWeill Cornell Medicine at the Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7180-2869
Sophie Tezenas du MontcelSorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute, INSERM, INRIA, CNRS, APHP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2866-4330
READISCA Consortium

Funding

Supplementary funding for U01NS104326 Clinical Trial Readiness for SCA1 and SCA3 (“READISCA”)U01NS104326 · NINDS · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ASHIZAWA, TETSUO, DURR, ALEXANDRA · 2018 to 2022
$6.1M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS104326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) is the reference clinical scale to assess the severity of cerebellar ataxia. In the context of upcoming therapeutic trials, a reliable clinical outcome is needed to assess the efficiency of treatments.

objectiveThe aim is to precisely assess and compare temporal dynamics of SARA and a new f-SARA.

methodsWe analyzed data from four cohorts (EUROSCA, RISCA, CRC-SCA, and SPATAX) comprising 1210 participants and 4092 visits. The linearity of the progression and the variability were assessed using an ordinal Bayesian mixed-effect model (Leaspy). We performed sample size calculations for therapeutic trials with different scenarios to improve the responsiveness of the scale.

resultsSeven of the eight different items had a nonlinear progression. The speed of progression was different between most of the items, with an average time for a one-point increase from 3.5 years [3.4; 3.6] (median, 95% credible interval) for the fastest item to 11.4 [10.9; 12.0] years. The total SARA score had a linear progression with an average time for a one-point increase of 0.95 [0.92; 0.98] years. After removing the four last items and rescaling all items from 0 to 4, variability increased and progression was slower and thus would require a larger sample size in a future therapeutic trial.

conclusionDespite a heterogeneous temporal dynamics at the item level, the global progression of SARA was linear. Changing the initial scale deteriorates the responsiveness. This new information about the temporal dynamics of the scale should help design the outcome of future clinical trials. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Indexed as

Cerebellar AtaxiaMovement DisordersSpinocerebellar AtaxiasBayes TheoremDisease ProgressionHumansdisease course mappingScale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxiaspinocerebellar ataxia

Identifiers

PMID36273394
PMCPMC9851985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.