Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273363›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2023

Comparing the RETeval

Jia Yue You, Allison L Dorfman, Mathieu Gauvin, Dylan Vatcher, Robert C Polomeno, John M Little, Pierre Lachapelle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Selective i-wave attenuation in unilateral high myopia.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Comparing the RETevalDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jia Yue YouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Allison L DorfmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Mathieu GauvinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Dylan VatcherDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Robert C PolomenoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
John M LittleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Pierre LachapelleDepartment of Ophthalmology, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center and the Montreal Children's Hospital, Glen Site, Block E, Room EM03238 (Program Mail Drop Point EM3211), 1001 Decarie Boulevard, Montréal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. pierre.lachapelle@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-7792-1102
Montreal Children's Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR MOP-126082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur study aimed to determine if ISCEV standard-like ERGs recorded with the LKC RETeval

methodsERGs recorded from normal subjects and patients affected with retinal ON and OFF pathway anomalies were compared. Analysis included peak time and amplitude measurements as well as time-frequency domain analysis with the discrete wavelet transform of waveforms obtained with the two systems.

resultsAlthough both systems were similarly able to record reliable and highly reproducible ERG responses, there were major discrepancies in ERG responses between the portable and tabletop units, pointing toward a weaker stimulation of the retinal OFF pathway with the portable RETeval

conclusionThe portable RETeval

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyRetinal DiseasesHumansRetinaWavelet AnalysisElectroretinographyHandheld stimulatorRecording systemRETeval ®RetinopathyTabletop stimulator

Identifiers

PMID36273363
PMCPMC10082128
OpenAlexW4307102831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.