Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273216›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Enriched enrollment randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial with phenytoin cream in painful chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (EPHENE): a study protocol.

David J Kopsky, Ruben P A van Eijk, Janna K Warendorf, Jan M Keppel Hesselink, Nicolette C Notermans, Alexander F J E Vrancken

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04647877 (Enrichment Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Cross-over Trial With PHEnytoin Cream in Patients With Painful Chronic Idiopathic Axonal polyNEuropathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04647877 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Enrichment Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Cross-over Trial With PHEnytoin Cream in Patients With Painful Chronic Idiopathic Axonal polyNEuropathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorDavid J. KopskyRan2020 to 2023Enrolled81ConditionsChronic Idiopathic Axonal PolyneuropathyArmsphenytoin cream, Placebo cream
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J KopskyInstitute for Neuropathic Pain, Amsterdam / Soest / Bosch en Duin, The Netherlands. d.j.kopsky@umcutrecht.nl.
Ruben P A van EijkDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janna K WarendorfDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan M Keppel HesselinkInstitute for Neuropathic Pain, Amsterdam / Soest / Bosch en Duin, The Netherlands.
Nicolette C NotermansDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alexander F J E VranckenDepartment of Neurology, Brain Centre University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-6534
Utrecht University · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds W.OK19-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with chronic idiopathic axonal polyneuropathy (CIAP) can have neuropathic pain that significantly impacts quality of life. Oral neuropathic pain medication often has insufficient pain relief and side effects. Topical phenytoin cream could circumvent these limitations. The primary objectives of this trial are to evaluate (1) efficacy in pain reduction and (2) safety of phenytoin cream in patients with painful CIAP. The main secondary objective is to explore the usefulness of a double-blind placebo-controlled response test (DOBRET) to identify responders to sustained pain relief with phenytoin cream.

methodsThis 6-week, enriched enrollment randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled triple cross-over trial compares phenytoin 20%, 10% and placebo cream in 48 participants with painful CIAP. Enriched enrollment is based on a positive DOBRET in 48 participants who experience within 30 minutes ≥2 points pain reduction on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) in the phenytoin 10% cream applied area and ≥1 point difference in pain reduction on the NRS between phenytoin 10% and placebo cream applied area, in favour of the former. To explore whether DOBRET has predictive value for sustained pain relief, 24 DOBRET-negative participants will be included. An open-label extension phase is offered with phenytoin 20% cream for up to one year, to study long-term safety. The main inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of CIAP and symmetrical neuropathic pain with a mean weekly pain score of ≥4 and <10 on the NRS. The primary outcome is the mean difference between phenytoin 20% versus placebo cream in 7-day average pain intensity, as measured by the NRS, over week 2 in DOBRET positive participants. Key secondary outcomes include the mean difference in pain intensity between phenytoin 10% and phenytoin 20% cream, and between phenytoin 10% and placebo cream. Furthermore, differences between the 3 interventions will be evaluated on the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, EuroQol EQ5-5D-5L, and evaluation of adverse events. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence on the efficacy and safety of phenytoin cream in patients with painful CIAP and will give insight into the usefulness of DOBRET as a way of personalized medicine to identify responders to sustained pain relief with phenytoin cream.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04647877 . Registered on 1 December 2020.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaPolyneuropathiesCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodHumansPhenytoinQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPhenytoinCIAPCreamCross-over trialCryptogenic PolyneuropathyIdiopathic polyneuropathyNeuropathic painPhenytoinPolyneuropathyRandomized studyTopical

Identifiers

PMID36273216
PMCPMC9587538
OpenAlexW4307134799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.