Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273185›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Identifying Child Anxiety Through Schools-identification to intervention (iCATS-i2i): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to compare screening, feedback and intervention for child anxiety problems to usual school practice.

Tessa Reardon, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Mara Violato, Susan Ball, Paul Brown, Tamsin Ford, Alastair Gray, Claire Hill, Bec Jasper, Michael Larkin and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa ReardonDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. tessa.reardon@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-091X
Obioha C UkoumunneNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Mara ViolatoHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Susan BallNIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Paul BrownBransgore C of E Primary School, Bransgore, UK.
Tamsin FordUniversity of Cambridge and Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Alastair GrayHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claire HillSchool of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Bec JasperParents and Carers Together, Suffolk, UK.
Michael LarkinLife and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Ian MacdonaldCharlie Waller Trust, Thatcham, UK.
Fran MorganSquare Peg, East Sussex, UK.
Jack PollardHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michelle SanchoWest Berkshire Council, Newbury, UK.
Falko F SniehottaNIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Susan H SpenceSchool of Applied Psychology and Australian Institute of Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul StallardDepartment of Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Jason StainerStanley Primary School, Strathmore Road, London, UK.
Lucy TaylorDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Victoria WilliamsonDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emily DayDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jennifer FiskDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Iheoma GreenDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gemma HallidayDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ciara HenniganDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Samantha PearceyDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Olly RobertsonDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Cathy CreswellDepartments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBAston University · GBEast Sussex County Council · GBGriffith University · AUKing's College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Reading · GBUniversity of Suffolk · GBWiltshire Council · GB

Funding

Programme Grants for Applied Research RP-PG-0218-20010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystematically screening for child anxiety problems, and offering and delivering a brief, evidence-based intervention for children who are identified as likely to benefit would minimise common barriers that families experience in accessing treatment. We have developed a short parent-report child anxiety screening questionnaire, and procedures for administering screening questionnaires, sharing screening outcomes with families, and offering and delivering a brief parent-led online intervention (OSI: Online Support and Intervention for child anxiety) through schools. This trial aims to evaluate clinical and health economic outcomes for (1) children (aged 8-9) who screen positive for anxiety problems at baseline (target population) and (2) the wider population of all children in participating classes (total population) in schools randomly allocated to receive identification-to-intervention procedures and usual school practice ('screening and intervention'), compared to assessment and usual school practice only ('usual school practice'). 

methodsThe trial design is a parallel-group, superiority cluster randomised controlled trial, with schools (clusters) randomised to 'screening and intervention' or 'usual school practice' arms in a 1:1 ratio stratified according to the level of deprivation within the school. We will recruit schools and participants in two phases (a pilot phase (Phase 1) and Phase 2), with progression criteria assessed prior to progressing to Phase 2. In total, the trial will recruit 80 primary/junior schools in England, and 398 children (199 per arm) who screen positive for anxiety problems at baseline (target population). In schools allocated to 'screening and intervention': (1) parents/carers will complete a brief parent-report child anxiety screening questionnaire (at baseline) and receive feedback on their child's screening outcomes (after randomisation), (2) classes will receive a lesson on managing fears and worries and staff will be provided with information about the intervention and (3) parents/carers of children who screen positive for anxiety problems (target population) will be offered OSI. OSI will also be available for any other parents/carers of children in participating classes (total population) who request it. We will collect child-, parent- and teacher-report measures for the target population and total population at baseline (before randomisation), 4 months, 12 months and 24 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome will be the proportion of children who screen positive for anxiety problems at baseline (target population) who screen negative for anxiety problems 12 months post-randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial will establish if systematic screening for child anxiety problems, sharing screening outcomes with families and delivering a brief parent-led online intervention through schools is effective and cost-effective.

trial registrationISRCTN registry ISRCTN76119074. Prospectively registered on 4.1.2022.

Indexed as

AnxietySchoolsAnxiety DisordersCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFeedbackHumansParentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnxietyChildrenCost-effectivenessEarly interventionIdentificationOnline interventionParent-led interventionSchoolsScreening

Identifiers

PMID36273185
PMCPMC9587579
OpenAlexW4307135086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.