Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273161›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2022

Impact of random outliers in auto-segmented targets on radiotherapy treatment plans for glioblastoma.

Robert Poel, Elias Rüfenacht, Ekin Ermis, Michael Müller, Michael K Fix, Daniel M Aebersold, Peter Manser, Mauricio Reyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert PoelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. Robert.poel@insel.ch.
Elias RüfenachtARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Ekin ErmisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael MüllerARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Michael K FixDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daniel M AebersoldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter ManserDivision of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Mauricio ReyesARTORG Center for Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo save time and have more consistent contours, fully automatic segmentation of targets and organs at risk (OAR) is a valuable asset in radiotherapy. Though current deep learning (DL) based models are on par with manual contouring, they are not perfect and typical errors, as false positives, occur frequently and unpredictably. While it is possible to solve this for OARs, it is far from straightforward for target structures. In order to tackle this problem, in this study, we analyzed the occurrence and the possible dose effects of automated delineation outliers.

methodsFirst, a set of controlled experiments on synthetically generated outliers on the CT of a glioblastoma (GBM) patient was performed. We analyzed the dosimetric impact on outliers with different location, shape, absolute size and relative size to the main target, resulting in 61 simulated scenarios. Second, multiple segmentation models where trained on a U-Net network based on 80 training sets consisting of GBM cases with annotated gross tumor volume (GTV) and edema structures. On 20 test cases, 5 different trained models and a majority voting method were used to predict the GTV and edema. The amount of outliers on the predictions were determined, as well as their size and distance from the actual target.

resultsWe found that plans containing outliers result in an increased dose to healthy brain tissue. The extent of the dose effect is dependent on the relative size, location and the distance to the main targets and involved OARs. Generally, the larger the absolute outlier volume and the distance to the target the higher the potential dose effect. For 120 predicted GTV and edema structures, we found 1887 outliers. After construction of the planning treatment volume (PTV), 137 outliers remained with a mean distance to the target of 38.5 ± 5.0 mm and a mean size of 1010.8 ± 95.6 mm

conclusionsThis study shows that there is a severe risk of false positive outliers in current DL predictions of target structures. Additionally, these errors will have an evident detrimental impact on the dose and therefore could affect treatment outcome.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAutosegmentationDosimetryFalse positivesGlioblastomaTarget definition

Identifiers

PMID36273161
PMCPMC9587574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.