Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273148›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2022

The presence of ovarian endometrioma adversely affect ovarian reserve and response to stimulation but not oocyte quality or IVF/ICSI outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.

Cheng Zeng, Ruihui Lu, Xin Li, Yanrong Kuai, Sheng Wang, Qing Xue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Endometriosis and IVF treatment outcomes: unpacking the process.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng ZengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China.
Ruihui LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xin LiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yanrong KuaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China.
Sheng WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China.
Qing XueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, 100034, Beijing, P. R. China. drxueqing@163.com.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7194325National Natural Science Foundation of China 81901455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe possible impact of ovarian endometriomas (OMAs) on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes remains controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of OMAs on IVF cycle parameters, including ovarian reserve and response to stimulation, embryo quality and pregnancy outcomes.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 2067 patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2018 and December 2020. The study group included 154 infertile women who had OMAs. The control group consisted of 1913 women without endometriosis, and finally 305 women were matched according to maternal age, body mass index (BMI), and infertility duration by propensity score matching (PSM). Cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was set as the primary outcome measure. Logistic regression analysis was conducted on the basis of clinical covariates assessed for their association with CLBRs. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of ovarian surgery, cyst size and laterality on CLBRs.

resultsWomen with OMAs had significantly lower ovarian reserve markers (AMH and AFC), number of follicles, oocytes, embryos, and top-quality embryos than women in the control group (p < 0.05). However, the CLBRs were comparable between the two groups (55.64% versus 54.34%, p = 0.806), regardless of previous history of ovarian surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed association between age (OR = 0.861; 95% CI [0.806-0.921]; p = 0.000), top-quality embryos (OR = 1.829; 95% CI [1.526-2.193]; p = 0.000) and the CLBRs. A negative correlation between OMA size and AFC levels in patients with unoperated OMAs was detected (r = -0.264, p = 0.007). Meanwhile, significant decrease in ovarian reserve with lower AFC, fewer oocytes, embryos and top-quality embryos were observed in patients with OMAs size ≥ 6 cm (p < 0.05). Moreover, ovaries with OMAs had a significantly lower AFC (P = 0.006) but similar number of oocytes when compared with contralateral ovaries without OMAs.

conclusionInfertile women with OMAs were implicated in considerable decreases in ovarian reserve and response to stimulation, but no apparent adverse effects on oocyte quality or clinical outcomes. OMAs surgery and OMAs size may adversely affect ovarian reserve, but not CLBR.

Indexed as

EndometriosisInfertility, FemaleOvarian ReserveFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicARTClinical outcomesEndometriosisOvarian reserveOvarian response

Identifiers

PMID36273148
PMCPMC9587543
OpenAlexW4307066994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.