Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273121›Full record

SynthesisBMC pediatrics2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in children.

Fardis Vosoughi, Rangarirai Makuku, Marcarious M Tantuoyir, Farbod Yousefi, Parnian Shobeiri, Amirali Karimi, Sanam Alilou, Ronald LaPorte, Curtis Tilves, Mohammad Hossein Nabian and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [RSV versus SARS-CoV-2 in children : Comparison of hospitalised cases].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fardis VosoughiDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Shariati Hospital, and, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9136-0479
Rangarirai MakukuCenter for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research (COTAR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3305-2053
Marcarious M TantuoyirCenter for Orthopedic Trans-Disciplinary Applied Research (COTAR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. macasty1234@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7645-9999
Farbod YousefiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-8195
Parnian ShobeiriSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-5282-3282
Amirali KarimiSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1241-7754
Sanam AlilouSchool of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9228-827X
Ronald LaPorteDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Curtis TilvesDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mohammad Hossein NabianDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Shariati Hospital, and, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mir Saeed YekaninejadDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Poursina Avenue, Tehran, Iran. yekaninejad@tums.ac.ir.ORCID 0000-0003-3648-5276
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRShariati Hospital · IRUniversity of Pittsburgh · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of Ghana · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral individual studies from specific countries have reported rising numbers of pediatric COVID-19 cases with inconsistent reports on the clinical symptoms including respiratory and gastrointestinal symptoms as well as diverse reports on the mean age and household exposure in children. The epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 in children are not fully understood, hence, comprehensive meta-analyses are needed to provide a better understanding of these characteristics.

methodsThis review was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, and published reports on COVID-19 in children. Data were extracted by two independent researchers and a third researcher resolved disputes. STATA software and the random-effect model were used in the synthesis of our data. For each model, the heterogeneity between studies was estimated using the Q Cochrane test. Heterogeneity and publication bias were calculated using the I

resultsThe qualitative systematic review was performed on 32 articles. Furthermore, the meta-analysis estimated an overall rate of involvement at 12% (95% CI: 9-15%) among children, with an I

conclusionsThe pediatric clinical picture of COVID-19 is not simply a classic respiratory infection, but unusual presentations have been reported. Given the high incidence of household transmission and atypical clinical presentation in children, we strongly recommend their inclusion in research and population-based preventive measures like vaccination as well as clinical trials to ensure efficacy, safety, and tolerability in this age group.

Indexed as

COVID-19ChildCoughFatigueFeverHumansSARS-CoV-2ChildrenCOVID-19EpidemiologyMeta-AnalysisPediatricsSARS-COV-2Systematic review

Identifiers

PMID36273121
PMCPMC9587668
OpenAlexW4307136159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.