Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273091›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Ambiguous controls on simulated diazotrophs in the world oceans.

U Löptien, H Dietze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

U LöptienDepartment of Computer Science, Archaeoinformatics - Data Science, University of Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118, Kiel, Germany. ulrike.loeptien@ifg.uni-kiel.de.
H DietzeDepartment of Computer Science, Archaeoinformatics - Data Science, University of Kiel, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, 24118, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen fixers, or diazotrophs, play a key role in the nitrogen and carbon cycle of the world oceans. Diazotrophs are capable of utilising atmospheric dinitrogen which is a competitive advantage over generally faster growing ordinary phytoplankton in nitrogen-depleted conditions in the sun-lit surface ocean. In this study we argue that additional competitive advantages must be at play in order to explain the dynamics and distribution of diazotrophs in the global oceans. Backed by growing published evidence we test the effects of preferential grazing (where zooplankton partly avoids diazotrophs) and high-affinity diazotrophic phosphorus uptake in an Earth System Model of intermediate complexity. Our results illustrate that these fundamentally different model assumptions result in a very similar match to observation-based estimates of nitrogen fixation while, at the same time, they imply very different trajectories into our warming future. The latter applies to biomass, fixation rates as well as to the ratio of the two. We conclude that a more comprehensive understanding of the competition between ordinary and diazotrophic phytoplankton will reduce uncertainties in model-based projections of the oceanic N cycle.

Indexed as

Nitrogen FixationPhytoplanktonNitrogenOceans and SeasPhosphorusSeawaterNitrogenPhosphorus

Identifiers

PMID36273091
PMCPMC9588038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.