Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273023›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Singleplex, multiplex and pooled sample real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an occupational medicine setting.

Kimberly S Butler, Bryan D Carson, Joshua D Podlevsky, Cathryn M Mayes, Jessica M Rowland, DeAnna Campbell, J Bryce Ricken, George Wudiri, SNL COVID Dx Assay Team, Jerilyn A Timlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly S ButlerMolecular and Microbiology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
Bryan D CarsonMolecular and Microbiology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
Joshua D PodlevskyMolecular and Microbiology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
Cathryn M MayesWMD Threats and Aerosol Science, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
Jessica M RowlandGlobal Chemical and Biological Security, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
DeAnna CampbellBiological and Chemical Sensors Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
J Bryce RickenMolecular and Microbiology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
George WudiriCooperative Nuclear Counterproliferation, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA.
SNL COVID Dx Assay Team
Jerilyn A TimlinMolecular and Microbiology Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87123, USA. jatimli@sandia.gov.
Sandia National Laboratories · USSandia National Laboratories California · USSensors (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For workplaces which cannot operate as telework or remotely, there is a critical need for routine occupational SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing. Although diagnostic tests including the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (CDC Diagnostic Panel) (EUA200001) were made available early in the pandemic, resource scarcity and high demand for reagents and equipment necessitated priority of symptomatic patients. There is a clearly defined need for flexible testing methodologies and strategies with rapid turnaround of results for (1) symptomatic, (2) asymptomatic with high-risk exposures and (3) asymptomatic populations without preexisting conditions for routine screening to address the needs of an on-site work force. We developed a distinct SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assay based on the original CDC Diagnostic Panel (EUA200001), yet, with minimum overlap for currently employed reagents to eliminate direct competition for limited resources. As the pandemic progressed with testing loads increasing, we modified the assay to include 5-sample pooling and amplicon target multiplexing. Analytical sensitivity of the pooled and multiplexed assays was rigorously tested with contrived positive samples in realistic patient backgrounds. Assay performance was determined with clinical samples previously assessed with an FDA authorized assay. Throughout the pandemic we successfully tested symptomatic, known contact and travelers within our occupational population with a ~ 24-48-h turnaround time to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace. Our singleplex assay had a detection limit of 31.25 copies per reaction. The three-color multiplexed assay maintained similar sensitivity to the singleplex assay, while tripling the throughput. The pooling assay further increased the throughput to five-fold the singleplex assay, albeit with a subtle loss of sensitivity. We subsequently developed a hybrid 'multiplex-pooled' strategy to testing to address the need for both rapid analysis of samples from personnel at high risk of COVID infection and routine screening. Herein, our SARS-CoV-2 assays specifically address the needs of occupational healthcare for both rapid analysis of personnel at high-risk of infection and routine screening that is essential for controlling COVID-19 disease transmission. In addition to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, this work demonstrates successful flexible assays developments and deployments with implications for emerging highly transmissible diseases and future pandemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational MedicineClinical Laboratory TechniquesCOVID-19 TestingHumansReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID36273023
PMCPMC9587995
OpenAlexW4307137893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.