Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36273003›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Protein language models trained on multiple sequence alignments learn phylogenetic relationships.

Umberto Lupo, Damiano Sgarbossa, Anne-Florence Bitbol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Protein Language Models are Accidental Taxonomists.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Phylogenetic Methods Meet Deep Learning.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  13. Protein Structural Phylogenetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. G-Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umberto LupoInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. umberto.lupo@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-6767-493X
Damiano SgarbossaInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7878-6061
Anne-Florence BitbolInstitute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. anne-florence.bitbol@epfl.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-494X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-supervised neural language models with attention have recently been applied to biological sequence data, advancing structure, function and mutational effect prediction. Some protein language models, including MSA Transformer and AlphaFold's EvoFormer, take multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of evolutionarily related proteins as inputs. Simple combinations of MSA Transformer's row attentions have led to state-of-the-art unsupervised structural contact prediction. We demonstrate that similarly simple, and universal, combinations of MSA Transformer's column attentions strongly correlate with Hamming distances between sequences in MSAs. Therefore, MSA-based language models encode detailed phylogenetic relationships. We further show that these models can separate coevolutionary signals encoding functional and structural constraints from phylogenetic correlations reflecting historical contingency. To assess this, we generate synthetic MSAs, either without or with phylogeny, from Potts models trained on natural MSAs. We find that unsupervised contact prediction is substantially more resilient to phylogenetic noise when using MSA Transformer versus inferred Potts models.

Indexed as

LanguageProteinsAlgorithmsPhylogenySequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID36273003
PMCPMC9588007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.