Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36272135›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

In vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ceftibuten/ledaborbactam, a novel oral β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination.

Andrew J Fratoni, Lindsay M Avery, David P Nicolau, Tomefa E Asempa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A Review ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. ARGONAUT-IV: susceptibility of carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  8. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J FratoniCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford 06102, CT, USA.
Lindsay M AveryVenatorx Pharmaceuticals, Malvern, PA, USA.
David P NicolauCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford 06102, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-3263
Tomefa E AsempaCenter for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford 06102, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6268-0924
Hartford Hospital · USVenatoRx Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201600029C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOral β-lactam treatment options for MDR Enterobacterales are lacking. Ledaborbactam (formerly VNRX-5236) is a novel orally bioavailable β-lactamase inhibitor that restores ceftibuten activity against Ambler Class A-, C- and D-producing Enterobacterales. We assessed the ledaborbactam exposure needed to produce bacteriostasis against ceftibuten-resistant Enterobacterales in the presence of humanized ceftibuten exposures in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model.

methodsTwelve ceftibuten-resistant clinical isolates (six Klebsiella pneumoniae, five Escherichia coli and one Enterobacter cloacae) were utilized. Ceftibuten/ledaborbactam MICs ranged from 0.12 to 2 mg/L (ledaborbactam fixed at 4 mg/L). A ceftibuten murine dosing regimen mimicking ceftibuten 600 mg q12h human exposure was developed and administered alone and in combination with escalating exposures of ledaborbactam. The log10 cfu/thigh change at 24 h relative to 0 h controls was plotted against ledaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC and the Hill equation was used to determine exposures associated with bacteriostasis.

resultsThe mean ± SD 0 h bacterial burden was 5.96 ± 0.24 log10 cfu/thigh. Robust growth (3.12 ± 0.93 log10 cfu/thigh) was achieved in untreated control mice. Growth of 2.51 ± 1.09 log10 cfu/thigh was observed after administration of humanized ceftibuten monotherapy. Individual isolate exposure-response relationships were strong (mean ± SD R2 = 0.82 ± 0.15). The median ledaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC associated with stasis was 3.59 among individual isolates and 6.92 in the composite model.

conclusionsLedaborbactam fAUC0-24/MIC exposures for stasis were quantified with a ceftibuten human-simulated regimen against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. This study supports the continued development of oral ceftibuten/ledaborbactam etzadroxil (formerly ceftibuten/VNRX-7145).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase InhibitorsAnimalsbeta-LactamasesCeftibutenEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeLactamsMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamase Inhibitorsbeta-LactamasesCeftibutenLactams

Identifiers

PMID36272135
PMCPMC10205465
OpenAlexW4307092289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.