ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Cell Dissociation Techniques in Salamanders.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two axolotl-adapted cell-ablation platforms reveal macrophage-dependent processes essential for spinal-cord and skeletal regeneration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cell dissociation is an important technique for the study of tissue phenotypes. The method chosen to harvest cells from solid tissues profoundly influences the types of cells recovered. Methodology also shapes any biases that are introduced that can act upon cell surface protein phenotypes or gene expression. Here we describe examples of cell surface phenotypic changes and typical yields, under 4 different isolation conditions (enzymatic/non-enzymatic), using the axolotl spleen, and the regenerating limb. We describe simple methods for evaluating the liberation of viable cells and the downstream characterization of cell diversity using a live-cell flow cytometry approach. Of note, the cellular composition of dissociated cells and surface antigen detection vary with each condition. TrypLE and "no enzyme" protocols give the highest surface marker expression, but poor liberation of non-immune cells in the blastema. Liberase-DH and Liberase-TL have alternative neutral proteases and both give acceptable dissociation of diverse cell types in the blastema. Liberase-TL provides the highest yield of all cell sizes and a larger non-immune fraction. Matching dissociation times between limb blastemas and spleens, we demonstrate the effect of "over-digestion" in soft tissues. In the spleen, the Liberase enzyme cocktails produced the lowest yields, worst viability, and the greatest loss of immune cell surface markers, when compared with non-enzymatic and TrypLE dissociation. These examples provide a template for optimizing protocols for individual tissues while achieving the balance between cell recovery and the mitigation of cellular changes appropriate for downstream applications such as single-cell RNA sequencing and flow cytometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.