Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36272049›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2022

Optimal First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus.

Midhun Malla, Jacob Fuqua, Sarbajit Mukherjee, Richard M Goldberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Midhun MallaWest Virginia University Department of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Dr, Morgantown, WV, 26506-1200, USA.
Jacob FuquaWest Virginia University Department of Medicine, 1 Medical Center Dr, Morgantown, WV, 26506-1200, USA.
Sarbajit MukherjeeRoswell Park Cancer Institute Department of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Elm and Carlton St, Buffalo, NY, 14263-0001, USA.
Richard M GoldbergWest Virginia University Cancer Institute, 1 Medical Center Dr, Morgantown, WV, 26506-1200, USA. Richard.goldberg@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0308-8223
West Virginia University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementTreatment strategies for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients continue to advance with the generation of more data from clinical trials that are permitting us to refine the use of immunotherapy in combination with other treatment modalities. While the frontline therapy for metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma has become more complicated with the approval of combination regimens, it is also yielding better outcomes. These treatment strategies can now be individualized to fit patient circumstances and goals as well as the biomarker profile of their individual tumors leading to an increased likelihood of treatment related remissions and extended median survivals. Comprehensive genomic profiling at diagnosis should now be standard to allow the management team to customize each patient's treatment plan based on the genetic abnormalities discovered in their tumor. By refining these targeted approaches, we will see decreased toxicities and increased survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaEsophageal NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansBiomarkersBiomarkerEsophageal adenocarcinomaHER-2ImmunotherapyMicrosatellite instabilityPD-L1 expression

Identifiers

PMID36272049
PMCPMC9589739
OpenAlexW4307090634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.