Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36272028›Full record

ReviewIrish journal of medical science2023

Anatomical variation in the branching pattern of the aortic arch: a literature review.

Anna Murray, Eiman Abdel Meguid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Irish journal of medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Embryology of the Vascular System: Implications for Variants.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna MurrayQueen's University Belfast, University Road, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK. amurray74@qub.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-5882
Eiman Abdel MeguidSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Whitla Medical Building, Queen's University Belfast, 1st Floor, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany anatomical variations of the branching pattern of the aortic arch have been documented in the literature. These find their origin in alterations to the embryological development of the arch and have significant implications for surgical and radiological interventions.

methodsEmbase and Medline database searches were carried out in June 2021 and identified 1197 articles, of which 24 were considered eligible.

resultsTwenty-eight variations were found. The prevalence of the six main variations found is as follows: normal configuration (61.2-92.59%); bovine arch type 1 (4.95-31.2%); bovine arch type 2 (0.04-24%); origin of left vertebral artery (0.17-15.3%); aberrant right subclavian artery (0.08-3.33%); thyroid ima artery (0.08-2%). Concomitant variations present in conjunction with these variations are also documented, as were other variations which could not be classified into these six groups.

conclusionsAnatomical variations in the branching pattern of the aortic arch are present in over one-third of individuals in some populations. These are important pre- and intra-operatively during thoracic, neck and thyroid surgery. A greater effort should be employed to construct an official classification to facilitate greater understanding among clinicians.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicCardiovascular AbnormalitiesHumansPrevalenceSubclavian ArteryAberrant subclavian arteryAnatomical variationArch of aortaBovine archBrachiocephalic trunkVertebral artery

Identifiers

PMID36272028
PMCPMC10390593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.