Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271969›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2022

Good practices for

Bryce J B Nelson, Jan D Andersson, Frank Wuest, Sarah Spreckelmeyer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Straightforward PET phantom preparation usingAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. ExpandingEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Development of an automated radiosynthesis for [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Bridging Research and Clinical Practice: Automated [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. ScalableWorld journal of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Long-term performance evaluation of a novel 3.26 GBqEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Diagnostic value of [Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Optimized Automated Cassette-Based Synthesis of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Pharmaceutics · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryce J B NelsonDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Jan D AnderssonDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Frank WuestDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Sarah SpreckelmeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität Zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. sarah.spreckelmeyer@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-0309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe radiometal gallium-68 ( MAIN BODY: These

conclusionThis review outlines important aspects of

Indexed as

68Ga-radiolabeling68Ga-tracerAutomationCyclotronGallium-68RadiolabelingRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID36271969
PMCPMC9588110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.