Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271953›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022

Minimally invasive anatomic reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament with ipsilateral gracilis tendon: a kinematic in-vitro study.

Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Vito Gaetano Rinaldi, Marcello Zappia, Giada Lullini, Simone Bignozzi, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giovanni Felice Trinchese

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Giulio Maria Marcheggiani MuccioliII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Vito Gaetano RinaldiII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Marcello ZappiaDepartment of Medicine and Health Science University of Molise Campobasso Italy.
Giada LulliniDIBINEM University of Bologna via di Barbiano, 1/10 - c/o Lab Biomeccanica ed Innovazione Tecnologica 40136 Bologna Italy.
Simone BignozziOrthokey Srl Florence Italy.
Stefano ZaffagniniII Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Giovanni Felice TrincheseDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Villa Malta Hospital Sarno SA Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITInstitute of Protein Biochemistry · ITIstituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITUniversity of Florence · ITVilla Torri Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been defined as a key stabilizer of internal tibial rotation at 35° or more of knee flexion, with a minimal primary or secondary stabilizing role in the AP direction. This study aimed to demonstrate that anatomical reconstruction of the ALL confers rotational stability equal to that of the uninjured knee. Hypothesis: anteroposterior (AP) and rotatory laxity will significantly vary after ALL tenotomy and ALL reconstruction with the author's previously described technique. Methods: After ultrasound (US) ALL identification, different kinematic measurements were performed with an image-less Computer-Assisted Navigation System with dedicated software for Laxity Analysis in 5 knee specimens. Anteroposterior (AP) translations and varus/valgus (VV) and Internal-External (IE) rotations were evaluated by two trained orthopedic surgeons before ALL section, after ALL section, and after ALL anatomical reconstruction with doubled ipsilateral autologous gracilis tendon. Results: ALL resection significantly increased laxity in IE rotations with knee 90° flexed (IE90) and AP translation with tibia internally rotated and the knee 30° flexed (APlat) ( Conclusions: ALL acted as an important internal tibial rotation restrain at 90° and a significant (secondary) AP stabilizer at 30° of knee flexion. The presented ALL reconstruction technique significantly restored the increase of knee laxity produced by the ALL section. Scientific level: Case-Controlled Laboratory Study, Level III.

Indexed as

Anatomical reconstructionAnterolateral ligamentIn‐vitro studyKinematicsKnee jointLaxity

Identifiers

PMID36271953
PMCPMC9588119
OpenAlexW4307066845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.