ArticleBrain and behavior2022
The protective effects of nesfatin-1 in neurological dysfunction after spinal cord injury by inhibiting neuroinflammation.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Markers of Antiseizure Treatment Efficacy in Children: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The Impact of Nuclear Factor Kappa B on the Response of Microglia in Spinal Cord Injuries.Cureus · 2025Review
- Can minor trauma cause asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression leading to severe cervical spinal cord injury in rats?Neuroreport · 2025Article
- FOXO3-induced microRNA-128-3p promotes the progression of spinal cord injury in mice via regulating NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated pyroptosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- The protective effects of nesfatin-1 in neurological dysfunction after spinal cord injury by inhibiting neuroinflammation.Brain and behavior · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsSpinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most severe neurological diseases. However, there is still no effective treatment for it. Nesfatin, a precursor neuropeptide derived from nucleobindin 2 (NUCB2), has displayed a wide range of protective effects in different types of cells and tissue. However, the effects of nesfatin-1 in SCI have not been reported before. MATERIALS AND
methodsA SCI model was established. The behavior of mice was assessed using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) assessment.
resultsHere, we report that the administration of nesfatin-1 improved neurological recovery in SCI mice by increasing BBB scores, reducing lesion area volume and spinal cord water content. Also, nesfatin-1 ameliorated oxidative stress by reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. We also found that nesfatin-1 prevented neuronal apoptosis in SCI mice by reducing caspase 3 activity and the expression of Bax, as well as increasing B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2). Additionally, nesfatin-1 reduced the levels of interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Nesfatin-1 also promoted microglia towards M2 polarization by increasing the marker CD206 but reducing CD16. Importantly, nesfatin-1 enhanced the phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) but reduced the expression levels of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and phosphorylated nuclear factor kappa-B p65 (p-NF-κB p65).
conclusionOur findings imply that nesfatin-1 exerts neuroprotective actions in SCI by promoting the activation of M2 microglia, and its underlying mechanisms might be related to the activation of STAT1 and inhibition of the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.