Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271390›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Changes in retinal vascular bifurcation in eyes with myopia.

Caixia Sun, Tingli Chen, Jing Cong, Xinyuan Wu, Jing Wang, Yuanzhi Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. RBAD: A Dataset and Benchmark for Retinal Vessels Branching Angle Detection.... IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics. IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Caixia Sun *Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Tingli Chen *Department of Ophthalmology, Huadong Sanatorium, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Jing CongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Xinyuan WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Huadong Sanatorium, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yuanzhi YuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200032, Shanghai, China. yuan.yuanzhi@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Fudan University · CNHuadong Hospital · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of myopia on retinal vascular bifurcation.

methodsA cross-sectional study that retrospectively analyzed the fundus photographs and clinical data of 493 people who participated in routine physical examinations in Huadong Sanatorium. One eye of each subject was included in the analysis. Retinal vascular bifurcation measurements were extracted by using a validated computer program. One-way ANOVA and analysis of covariance were performed to compare the measurements across high myopia, low to moderate myopia, and non-myopia groups.

resultsThe mean age was 41.83 ± 10.43 years and 63.49% were women. The mean spherical equivalent refraction (SER) was - 4.59 ± 3.07 D. Ninety-nine (20.08%) eyes met the definition of high myopia (SER ≤ -6.0 D), along with 234 (47.46%) low to moderate myopia (-6.0 D < SER <-0.5 D), and 160 (32.45%) non-myopia (SER ≥ -0.5 D). The differences in the arteriolar branching angle, venular branching coefficient, venular asymmetry ratio, venular angular asymmetry, and venular junctional exponent among the three groups remained significant (p < 0.05) after multivariate adjustment. Pairwise comparisons showed arteriolar branching angle and venular angular asymmetry in high myopia were significantly lower than low to moderate myopia (p < 0.001, p = 0.014 respectively) and non-myopia (p = 0.007, p = 0.048 respectively). Venular asymmetry ratio and venular branching coefficient in high myopia were significantly higher than low to moderate myopia (p = 0.029, p = 0.001 respectively) and non-myopia (p = 0.041, p = 0.043 respectively). There was a significant difference in venular junctional exponent between high myopia and low to moderate myopia (p = 0.031).

conclusionThe vascular bifurcation differs in dependence on the myopic refractive error and a significant increase in the difference can be observed in high myopic eyes.

Indexed as

MyopiaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRefraction, OcularRetinaRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36271390
PMCPMC9585760
OpenAlexW4307051966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.