Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271383›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Malaria surveillance and case management in remote and indigenous communities of Panama: results from a community-based health worker pilot.

Darlene Bhavnani, Bernardo García Espinosa, Madeline Baird, Nicholas Presley, Arnaud Le Menach, Christina Bradley, Marcela Outten, Oscar González

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stratification and Adaptation of Malaria Control Interventions in Chad.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darlene BhavnaniClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama. Darlene.Bhavnani@Austin.utexas.edu.
Bernardo García EspinosaClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama.
Madeline BairdClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama.
Nicholas PresleyClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama.
Arnaud Le MenachClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama.
Christina BradleyClinton Health Access Initiative, Panama City, Panama.
Marcela OuttenMinisterio de Salud de Panama, Panama City, Panama.
Oscar GonzálezMinisterio de Salud de Panama, Panama City, Panama.
Clinton Health Access Initiative · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPanama is one of eight countries in Mesoamerica that aims to eliminate malaria by 2022. Malaria is concentrated in indigenous and remote regions like Guna Yala, a politically autonomous region where access to health services is limited and cases are predominately detected through intermittent active surveillance. To improve routine access to care, a joint effort was made by Guna Yala authorities and the Ministry of Health to pilot a network of community health workers (CHWs) equipped with rapid diagnostic tests and treatment. The impact of this pilot is described.

methodsAccess to care was measured using the proportion of villages targeted by the effort with active CHWs. Epidemiological impact was evaluated through standard surveillance and case management measures. Tests for differences in proportions or rates were used to compare measures prior to (October 2014-September 2016) and during the pilot (October 2016-September 2018).

resultsAn active CHW was placed in 39 (95%) of 41 target communities. During the pilot, CHWs detected 61% of all reported cases from the region. Test positivity in the population tested by CHWs (22%) was higher than in those tested through active surveillance, both before (3.8%) and during the pilot (2.9%). From the pre-pilot to the pilot period, annual blood examination rates decreased (9.8 per 100 vs. 8.0 per 100), test positivity increased (4.2% to 8.5%, Χ

conclusionsThe CHW network allowed for replacement of routine active surveillance with strong passive case detection leading to more targeted and timely testing and treatment. The higher test positivity among those tested by CHWs compared to active surveillance suggests that they detected cases in a high-risk population that had not previously benefited from access to diagnosis and treatment. Surveillance data acquired through this CHW network can be used to better target active case detection to populations at highest risk.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersMalariaCase ManagementHumansIncidencePanamaCase managementCommunity health workerEliminationGuna YalaMalariaPlasmodium vivaxRapid diagnostic testSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36271383
PMCPMC9587600
OpenAlexW4307168575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.