Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271372›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022

Influence of optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction: a short-term study.

Pan Liu, Dongyu Yu, Boyu Zhang, Shiqi Zhou, Haoran Zhu, Wanyun Qin, Xinqi Ye, Xianghui Li, Yan Zhang, Ying Bai and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of ablation-zone diameter on whole-corneal higher-order aberrations after LASEK: a retrospective study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pan Liu *Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Dongyu Yu *Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Boyu ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Shiqi ZhouHarbin Medical University, No.157 Baojian Road, Nangang District, 150081, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Haoran ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Wanyun QinDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Xinqi YeDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Xianghui LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Ying BaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Yuan WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Zhengbo ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, 150086, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China. shaozhengbohmu@126.com.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CN

Funding

Harbin Medical University Graduate Innovation and Practice Research Projec YJSCX2020102HYDHeilongjiang Postdoctoral Scientific Research Developmental Fund LBH-Q18082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the influence of preoperative optical zone on myopic correction in small incision lenticule extraction.

methodsIn this retrospective clinical study, 581 eyes from 316 patients underwent SMILE were selected, including 117 eyes in the small optical zone group (range from 6.0 to 6.4 mm) and 464 eyes in the large optical zone group (range from 6.5 to 6.8 mm). The measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical, and cylinder were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed with age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry and preoperative spherical equivalent between two different groups. The influence of optical zones on postoperative refractive outcomes were evaluated using univariate regression analysis.

resultsIn total, 78 pairs of eyes were selected by PSM (match ratio 1:1). There were no differences in the age, gender, eye (right/left), keratometry or preoperative spherical equivalent between the small and large optical zone groups. However, the difference of postoperative spherical equivalent was significantly between groups. Patients with larger optical zones had a trend towards less undercorrection (P = 0.018). Univariate linear regression model analysis found that each millimeter larger optical zone resulted in 8.13% or 0.39D less undercorrection (P < 0.001). The dependency between the optical zones and postoperative spherical equivalent was significant in the higher preoperative myopia group (r = 0.281, P < 0.001), but not significant in the lower myopia group (r = 0.028, P = 0.702).

conclusionThe diameter of optical zones would affect postoperative refractive outcomes in small incision lenticule extraction. This study indicated that larger optical zones induced less undercorrection, especially in patients with high myopia.

Indexed as

AstigmatismMyopiaCorneal StromaHumansLasers, ExcimerMicrosurgeryRefraction, OcularRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityMyopiaOptical zonesRefractive outcomesSmall incision lenticule extraction

Identifiers

PMID36271372
PMCPMC9585829
OpenAlexW4307168931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.