Trial reportBMC surgery2022
Comparison of freehand technique and a novel laser guiding navigation in distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of freehand technique and a novel laser-guiding navigation system in femoral neck-cannulated screw fixation: a randomized controlled trial.BMC surgery · 2023Trial
- Navigation System-Assisted vs Freehand Cannulated Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Observational
- A Trigonometric Technique for Distal Locking of Intramedullary Nails without the Need for Specific Instrumentation.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntramedullary nail (IMN) is one of the key essential minimally invasive "weapons" in orthopaedic trauma, while the distal locking is still challenging for surgeons. Although there are various inventions and technologies to improve the locking procedure, there are still problems such as inaccurate positioning, excessive radiation exposure, low first success rate and long learning curve. Therefore, a new laser guiding navigation device was designed and compared with the traditional freehand (FH) technique in the distal locking of femoral IMN.
methodsThis randomized controlled single-blind trial recruited patients with femoral diaphyseal fracture. The self-designed laser navigation device (laser group) and freehand technique (FH group) were used in the distal locking of the IMNs. The patients enrolled were randomized into FH group and laser group, all operations were performed by two surgeons of the same level. The differences between the two groups were compared in terms of radiation exposure time, operative time, first success rate, blood loss, visual analogue score (VAS), Harris score and healing time.
results32 patients ended the study period and 16 patients in each group. The results showed that the laser group was better than the FH group in terms of distal locking time (10(9/11) vs 19.5 (17.25/21) min, Z = 4.83, P < 0.001), distal locking radiation exposure time (46.5 (41.25/51.75) vs 105 (88.25/140) s, Z = 4.807, P < 0.001), first success rate (30/32 vs 20/32, χ
conclusionCompared with the FH technique, the novel laser guiding navigation device for distal locking of femoral IMN has the advantages of shorter operative time, less radiation exposure and higher first success rate. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200060236. Registered 23 May 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojen.aspx?proj=169130.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.