Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271273›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Determining the optical properties of solar cells using low cost scanners.

Mattias Klaus Juhl, Binesh Puthen Veettil, Giuseppe Scardera, David Neil Roger Payne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mattias Klaus JuhlMacquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2113, Australia. mattias.juhl@mq.edu.au.
Binesh Puthen VeettilMacquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Giuseppe ScarderaUniversity of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
David Neil Roger PayneMacquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Australian Renewable Energy Agency DP025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of consumer flatbed scanners for the use of monitoring solar cell precursors. Two types of scanners are investigated a contact image scanner and scanners with more conventional optical setups. The contact image sensor is found to be more suitable as it does not require additional flat field calibration. The scanners' ability to monitor variation in sample texture was investigated by monitoring the reflection of multi-crystalline and mono-crystalline textured wafers. For a baseline, a comparison was made to a high-end tool used in industry. Both good qualitative agreement and statistical correlation were achieved between the scanner and industry tool for the isotropic multi-crystalline wafers.

Identifiers

PMID36271273
PMCPMC9587242
OpenAlexW4307028129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.