Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36271197›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Association of sweetened beverages consumption with all-cause mortality risk among Dutch adults: the Lifelines Cohort Study (the SWEET project).

Novita D Naomi, Elske M Brouwer-Brolsma, Marion E C Buso, Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu, Joanne A Harrold, Jason C G Halford, Anne Raben, Johanna M Geleijnse, Edith J M Feskens

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Novita D NaomiDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Elske M Brouwer-BrolsmaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Marion E C BusoDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sabita S Soedamah-MuthuDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic Diseases (CORPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Joanne A HarroldDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jason C G HalfordDepartment of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Anne RabenDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise, and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johanna M GeleijnseDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Edith J M FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 17, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. edith.feskens@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-2488

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 774293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExamined associations between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), low/no-calorie beverages (LNCB), and fruit juice (FJ) consumption and all-cause mortality in Dutch adults.

methodsData of 118,707 adults participating (mean age = 45 years; 60% was women) the Lifelines Cohort Study were prospectively analyzed. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Participants' vital status was followed-up until February 2022 via the National Personal Records Database. Associations between beverages of interest and all-cause mortality risk were investigated using restricted cubic spline and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, including substitution analyses. Models were adjusted for demographics, lifestyle, and other dietary factors.

resultsDuring follow-up (median = 9.8 years), a total of 2852 (2.4%) deaths were documented. Median (IQR) of SSB, LNCB, and FJ consumption were 0.1 (0.0-0.6), 0.1 (0.0-0.6), and 0.2 (0.0-0.6) serving/day, respectively. Dose-response analyses showed linear associations between SSB, LNCB, and FJ consumption and mortality risk. For each additional serving of SSB and LNCB, HRs of all-cause mortality risk were 1.09 (95% CI 1.03-1.16) and 1.06 (95% CI 1.00-1.11). Replacing SSB with LNCB showed a nonsignificant association with a lower mortality risk, particularly in women (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81-1.01). Finally, an inverse association between FJ and all-cause mortality was observed at moderate consumption with HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) for > 0-2 servings/week and HR of 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.98) for > 2-< 7 servings/week when compared to no consumption.

conclusionsOur study showed adverse associations between SSB consumption and all-cause mortality. Replacing SSB with LNCB might be associated with lower mortality risk, particularly in women. Moderate intake of FJ was associated with lower all-cause mortality risk.

Indexed as

Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdultBeveragesCohort StudiesEnergy IntakeFemaleFruit and Vegetable JuicesHumansMiddle AgedArtificial sweetenersDeathDutch adultsJuiceNon-nutritive sweetenersSoft drink

Identifiers

PMID36271197
PMCPMC9589708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.