ReviewNature protocols2023
Customizable, wireless and implantable neural probe design and fabrication via 3D printing.
Review in Nature protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Wireless Wearable Platform for Intravenous Drug Self-Administration in Freely Behaving Rats.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- IoT-enabled wireless neural implant for chronic, programmable neuropharmacology and optogenetics.Science advances · 2026Article
- Protocol to design and implement scalable wireless network system for high-throughput, automated behavioral and circuit neuroscience in mice.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine-Driven Modulation of the Gut-Brain Axis: Innovative Approaches to Managing Chronic Inflammation in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Rigid-Flexible Neural Optrode with Anti-Bending Waveguides and Locally Soft Microelectrodes for Multifunctional Biocompatible Neural Regulation.Micromachines · 2025Article
- 3D-printed optogenetic neural probe integrated with microfluidic tube for opsin/drug delivery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Wireless Modular Implantable Neural Device with One-touch Magnetic Assembly for Versatile Neuromodulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Advances in gut-brain organ chips.Cell proliferation · 2024Review
- Special Section Guest Editorial: Open-source neurophotonic tools for neuroscience.Neurophotonics · 2024Article
- RETRACTED: Embedded Sensors with 3D Printing Technology: Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Body-temperature softening electronic ink for additive manufacturing of transformative bioelectronics via direct writing.Science advances · 2024Article
- Printable devices for neurotechnology.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- 3D Printed Integrated Sensors: From Fabrication to Applications-A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This Protocol Extension describes the low-cost production of rapidly customizable optical neural probes for in vivo optogenetics. We detail the use of a 3D printer to fabricate minimally invasive microscale inorganic light-emitting-diode-based neural probes that can control neural circuit activity in freely behaving animals, thus extending the scope of two previously published protocols describing the fabrication and implementation of optoelectronic devices for studying intact neural systems. The 3D-printing fabrication process does not require extensive training and eliminates the need for expensive materials, specialized cleanroom facilities and time-consuming microfabrication techniques typical of conventional manufacturing processes. As a result, the design of the probes can be quickly optimized, on the basis of experimental need, reducing the cost and turnaround for customization. For example, 3D-printed probes can be customized to target multiple brain regions or scaled up for use in large animal models. This protocol comprises three procedures: (1) probe fabrication, (2) wireless module preparation and (3) implantation for in vivo assays. For experienced researchers, neural probe and wireless module fabrication requires ~2 d, while implantation should take 30-60 min per animal. Time required for behavioral assays will vary depending on the experimental design and should include at least 5 d of animal handling before implantation of the probe, to familiarize each animal to their handler, thus reducing handling stress that may influence the result of the behavioral assays. The implementation of customized probes improves the flexibility in optogenetic experimental design and increases access to wireless probes for in vivo optogenetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.